- Members - lists.sigcis.org

Women in Technological History Travel Grant for SHOT Conference
by Julie Cohn 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Greetings. You or one of your colleagues may find this announcement of travel grants for the October 26-29, 2017 SHOT Conference of interest: ***************************** Julie Cohn, Ph.D. Research Historian Center for Public History University of Houston 315 McElhinney Hall Houston, TX 77204-3007 cohnconnor(a)gmail.com jacohn(a)uh.edu

1 0

Computing is Work! - Siegen (Germany), July 6-8, 2017
by Sebastian Gießmann 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Dear SIGCIS, Tom Haigh and I have been busy preparing the "Computing is Work!" conference at Siegen University - and we would be very happy to see some of you this July! For those of you who can't: We do have plans to videotape this for documentation, although we do have the recent controversy about scholarly talks on film in mind. Watch out for program updates here: http://www.socialstudiesof.info/ComputingIsWork/ Kind regards, Sebastian Giessmann ______________ * * *Computing is Work! * *International Conference* *July 6–8, 2017* Universität Siegen, Artur-Woll-Haus Am Eichenhang 50, 57076 Siegen; Museum für Gegenwartskunst, Siegen Conveners: Thomas Haigh / Sebastian Giessmann * * We humans spend most of our waking lives working. Work includes cultural, intellectual, managerial, and emotional labor as well as physical toil. Despite this, most work by humanities and media scholars implicitly treats the study of work as marginal or uninteresting. Even the study of “digital practices” rarely engages with the specifics of the workplace, despite the importance of distributed micro-practices like clickworking. Information technology underpins the transformation of work today, as it has it in the past. We welcome interdisciplinary contributions that address computing as work practice, both on a local, situated, infrastructural level. Speakers will be exploring many kinds of work, from the work of computerized literary production to the work of scientific research. We believe that close attention to the social processes of work has the cross-cutting potential to integrate a variety of historical, social and ethnographic research approaches, from labor history to the scientific ethnography to the study of media practices as cooperative accomplishments, into a revealing whole. * * *July 6, Thursday *(Artur-Woll-Haus)** * * 9:30 OPENING REMARKS/ Computing is Work! /Thomas Haigh (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee/Siegen University) and Sebastian Giessmann (Siegen University) 10:00 ROUND TABLE /Computer Supported Cooperative Work as Theory and Practice / Erhard Schüttpelz / Volker Wulf (Siegen): // Moderator: Dave Randall (Siegen) 11:00 KEYNOTE Matthew Jones (Columbia University): /Data Mining is Work: Scaling Algorithms, Overcoming Friction, Redefining Knowledge/ Moderator: Carolin Gerlitz (Siegen) 14:00 PANEL: /Scientific Workplaces/ – Jens Schröter (Bonn): /Work will be 3D: Imaginary Workplaces and Volumetric Displays/ – Gerard Alberts (Amsterdam) /Archiving is Work, Archaeology Even More/ Moderator: Jörg Potthast (Siegen) 16:30 PANEL: /Structuring Labor/ – Roli Varma (University of New Mexico): /Women at Work: Decoding Femininity in Computing in India/ – Nathan Ensmenger (Indiana University): /Documentation is Work: Flowcharts as Temporal Boundary Objects/ Moderator: Axel Volmar (Siegen) ______ *July 7, Friday *(Artur-Woll-Haus and Museum für Gegenwartskunst)** * * 9:00 KEYNOTE Kjeld Schmidt (Copenhagen Business School): /Coordination is Work: The Problem of Computerizing Coordinative Practices/ Moderator: Erhard Schüttpelz (Siegen) 11:00 PANEL: /Workflows/ – Kari Kuutti (Oulo): /”Muddling through” is Work: a Plea for Workflow Oriented Computing/ – Maria Haigh (Milwaukee / Siegen): /Stopping Fake News is Work/ Moderator: Peter Tolmie (Siegen) 15:00 PANEL: /Institutions and Markets/ – Hallam Stevens (Nanyang Technological University): /Copycatting is Work: The Diverse Labours of the Shenzhen Electronics Markets/ – Ben Peters (University of Tulsa): /Networking is Work: How Computing Institutions Matter even When Networks Fail/ Moderator: Christian Henrich-Franke (Siegen) 18:00 KEYNOTE Fred Turner (Stanford University): /Bohemia is Work: Reimagining Art and Labor Inside Facebook/ Moderator: Ehler Voss (Siegen) (Venue: Museum für Gegenwartskunst, Unteres Schloss 1, 57072 Siegen). _______ * * *July 8, Saturday *(Artur-Woll-Haus)** * * 9:00 PANEL: /Fun and Games/ – Ksenia Tatarchenko (University of Geneva): /Leisure is Work: The Making of the Soviet Computing Collectives / – Laine Nooney (Georgia Tech): /Games are Work: Notes from the "Little Silicone Valley"/ Moderator: Nadine Taha (Siegen) 11:30 CLOSING REMARKS Thomas Haigh (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee/Siegen University) and Sebastian Giessmann (Siegen University) 12:00 KEYNOTE Matthew Kirschenbaum (University of Maryland): /(Even) Literature is Work! Word Processing and Literary Labor/ Moderator: Till Heilmann (Bonn) Participation is free. Please register in advance with Anja Höse: Anja.Hoese(a)sfb1187.uni-siegen.de <mailto:Anja.Hoese@sfb1187.uni-siegen.de>. Supported by the Siegen University iSchool, the Collaborative Research Centre “Media of Cooperation”, Siegen and the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research North Rhine-Westphalia. -- Dr. Sebastian Gießmann Collaborative Research Centre Media of Cooperation SFB Medien der Kooperation Universität Siegen http://www.mediacoop.uni-siegen.de https://www.facebook.com/mediaofcooperation http://www.sebastiangiessmann.de Telefon: 0049-(0)271-740-2586 Sprechstunde: n.V.

1 0

DEADLINE JUNE 30: SIGCIS CFP | MEASURE, MODEL, MIX: COMPUTER AS INSTRUMENT
by Laine Nooney 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

Reminder of upcoming *June 30* deadline for the annual 1-day conference of the Special Interest Group for Computing, Information and Society. CFP below and online <http://meetings.sigcis.org/call-for-papers.html>. The annual SIGCIS conference hosts traditional academic presentations,* as well as a dedicated Works-in-Progress session ideal for receiving feedback on dissertation proposals and chapters*, articles-in-progress, etc. *Travel support is available* for graduate students, contingent faculty and other scholars with limited institutional funding--so these groups are especially encouraged to apply! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *MEASURE, MODEL, MIX: COMPUTER AS INSTRUMENT* 2017 SIGCIS Conference Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | October 29, 2017 *Proposal Due Date: June 30, 2017 * *KEYNOTE SPEAKER* Joanna Radin <http://history.yale.edu/people/joanna-radin> | Department of History, Yale University *THEME* Computers are instruments of action. They are made to measure, model, and mix; count and aggregate; save and surveil; pick, parse, and select; and in a world of embedded systems, they are even designed to listen, wait, and relay. In many instances, these actions involve the computational transformation of other social and technological processes—from software that compiles the census to the suites of code assisting in the digital manipulation of sound and image. In other cases, computers register and create information at scales and speeds we have only begun to grasp: artificial intelligence, machine learning, and “big data” in all its local forms. And while often leveraged as democratizing, computers have long been known to amplify structural inequality, map over difference, and jettison “noise” that cannot be translated into a specific form of information. Measure, Model, Mix invites scholars and independent researchers across the disciplinary spectrum to explore the historical conditions of computation. Areas of engagement may include: - How have bureaucratic, scientific, and aesthetic computational instruments eroded, produced, and reproduced biopolitical and epistemological realities, past and present? - How can we analyze the relationships between computing and identity categories such as race, gender, sexuality, and ethnicity? - What are the historical foundations of computing’s contemporary capacity to recognize information? - How have cultures, subcultures, political systems and identity groups mobilized computational techniques for their own ends? SIGCIS is especially welcoming of new directions in scholarship. We maintain an inclusive atmosphere for scholarly inquiry, supporting both disciplinary and theoretical interventions from beyond the traditional history of technology, and with respect to promoting diversity in STEM. We welcome submissions from: histories of technology, computing, and science; science and technology studies; studies of women, gender, and sexuality; studies of race, ethnicity, and postcoloniality; film, media, and game studies; software and code studies; network and internet histories; music, sound studies, and art history; and all other applicable domains. The annual SIGCIS Conference begins immediately after the regular annual meeting of our parent organization, the Society for the History of Technology [SHOT]. SIGCIS welcomes everyone, inclusive of gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, ability, age, appearance, race, nationality or religion. We are committed to fostering a positive, productive space for all participants. *SUBMISSION FORMATS* SIGCIS welcomes proposals for individual 15-20 minute papers, 3-4 paper panel proposals, works-in-progress (see below), and non-traditional proposals such as roundtables, software demonstrations, hands-on workshops, etc. *WORKS-IN-PROGRESS* We are pleased to announce a new format for the 2017 SIGCIS Works in Progress (WiP) session. This year, participants will not deliver presentations on their WiP, and there will not be an audience. Instead, the session will serve as a workshop wherein participants will discuss the works in small group sessions. We invite works in progress—articles, chapters, dissertation prospectuses—of 10,000 words or less (longer works must be selectively edited to meet this length). We especially encourage submissions from graduate students, early career scholars, and scholars who are new to SIGCIS. Authors who submit a WiP will also commit to reading (in advance) two other WiPs, discussing them in a very small group setting, and providing written feedback on one of those WiPs. Scholars who would like to participate in this session without submitting their own WiP are certainly welcome; we ask that they commit to reading (in advance) at least two of the WiPs. Submissions for WiP only require a 350-400 word abstract, but applicants should plan to circulate their max-10,000-word WiPs no later than October 8, 2017. Scholars who would like to be a reader of WiPs, please email a brief bio or 1-page CV, along with your areas of interest and expertise, to Gerardo Con Diaz [condiaz(a)ucdavis.edu] *SUBMISSION PROCEDURE* Submissions are due June 30, 2017. Applicants should download, fill out and follow the instructions on the application cover sheet at http://meetings.sigcis.org/call-for-papers.html. All submissions will require: - 350-400 word abstract (full panel proposals should additionally include a 300-word panel abstract in addition to 3-4 paper abstracts) - 1-page CV or resume Please Note: Individuals already scheduled to participate on the main SHOT program are welcome to submit an additional proposal to our workshop, but should make sure that there is no overlap between the two presentations. However, SIGCIS may choose to give higher priority to submissions from those not already presenting at SHOT. Questions regarding submission procedure should be sent to Kera Allen [kera.allen(a)gatech.edu] *TRAVEL AWARD* The top financial priority of SIGCIS is the support of travel expenses for graduate students, visiting faculty without institutional travel support, and others who would be unable to attend the meeting without travel assistance. The submission cover sheet includes a box to check if you fall into one of these categories and would like to be considered for an award. These is no separate application form, though depending on the volume of requests and available resources we may need to contact you for further information before making a decision. Any award offered is contingent on registering for and attending the SIGCIS Conference. Please note that SHOT does not classify the SIGCIS Conference as participation in the SHOT annual meeting, therefore so acceptance by SIGCIS does not imply eligibility for the SHOT travel grant program. Details of available awards are at http://www.sigcis.org/travelaward. *SIGCIS CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE* Laine Nooney <http://www.lainenooney.com/>, New York University (SIGCIS Vice-Chair of Meetings) Andrew Russell <http://www.arussell.org/>, SUNY Polytechnic Institute (SIGCIS Chair) Stephanie Dick <https://hss.sas.upenn.edu/people/stephanie-dick>, University of Pennsylvania Gerardo Con Diaz <https://www.condiaz.com/>, University of California, Davis Joy Rankin <http://joyrankin.com/>, Michigan State University Kera Allen <https://hts.gatech.edu/people/person/e2f55e07-937a-571a-a4f8-c32c87fef19d>, Georgia Institute of Technology (Conference Assistant) Nabeel Siddiqui <http://nabeelsiddiqui.net/>, College of William and Mary (Conference Assistant) -- Laine Nooney <http://www.lainenooney.com/> MCC <http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/mcc/> @ NYU <http://www.nyu.edu/> (incoming July 2017) Assistant Professor

1 0

Fwd: Reminder for the CFP : "Unix in Europe : between innovation, diffusion and heritage"
by Camille Paloque-Berges 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

Dear all, Please find enclosed the CFP for the *international conference**"Unix in Europe: between innovation, diffusion and heritage"* that will take place in Cnam (Paris, France), October, 19th, 2017. We are pleased to announce two keynote participations: - Laurent Bloch (cyberstrategy researcher at the French Institute of Strategic analysis) - Thomas Haigh (associate professor in History at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, School of Information studies) A one-page abstract (maximum 500 words) with a short biography is expected for June 30th 2017. The Cfp is also available at : <http://technique-societe.cnam.fr/international-symposium- unix-in-europe-between-innovation-diffusion-and-heritage-913107.kjsp> <http://technique-societe.cnam.fr/international-symposium-unix-in-europe-bet…> . Best regards, The organization comitee : Isabelle Astic, Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta, Pierre-Eric Mounier-Kuhn, Camille Paloque-Berges, Loïc Petitgirard > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *Call for contributions* > > *International symposium * > > *Unix in Europe: between innovation, diffusion and heritage* > > *Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France – October 19 > 2017* > > > > Communications and discussions will be held in French or English. > > > *Rationale* > > > The Unix system was born in the 1970s at the crossroads between two > interacting worlds: industry (the Bell Labs at AT&T) and academia (the > University of Berkeley computer science network). Its fast adoption > throughout computer research and engineering networks across the world > signaled the future success of the new system, fostering software > experiments within its open, multi-user and multi-tasking system running on > mini-computers – and later compatible with a larger part of computer > hardware. In the European context, how was this American innovation > propagated, adopted and adapted? Why was Unix of so much interest in this > context, then and now? A solid culture of Unix users might also explain > this success, as well as subsequent processes of appropriation and > inheritance, due to the long and complex history of Unix versioning. The > memory of Unix users is vivid indeed, fed by early accounts within the > computer world (Salus, 1994) as well as preservation initiatives (Toomey, > 2010). Moreover, the Unix system is a crucial reference in the history of > computing, in particular in the field of free and open source software > (Kelty, 2008), computer networks (Paloque-Berges, 2017), as well as in > programming language philosophy (Mélès, 2013). > > > In order to explore the variety of these interrogations, this symposium > encourages contributions from historians as well as philosophers, social > science researchers, and heritage professionals interested in the history > of computer open systems and software with a focus on Unix or who have a > wider perspective. It will also welcome protagonists and witnesses of Unix > culture and carriers of its memory. We wish to discuss and shed light on > several aspects of the development of Unix in Europe (including in > comparison or relation with the rest of the world) along three main lines: > historical and sociological, philosophical and epistemological, and > heritage- and preservation-oriented. > > > *1/ Historical and sociological perspectives* > > > Historically, the Unix system is linked to the promotion and development > in research on open systems and computer networks. How does this fit in the > context of industrial, scientific and technological policies defined at the > national and European level? The history of Unix thus reaches at least > three levels of interrogations: 1/ the forms, places and practices of > innovation around Unix in R&D labs and computing centers in companies, > schools and universities; 2/ planning, promoting and negotiating open > systems (norms and standards) from the perspective of science and/or > politics; 3/ international geopolitical relations, whether economical or > geopolitical and even geostrategic (for example between Unix users, with > users of other computer equipment or other hardware and software companies, > the role of embargos in the shipping of mini-computers, of code, and > military uses of Unix). > > > In parallel, how has the world of computer research welcomed, encouraged, > negotiated and propagated uses and innovations related to Unix systems? > This begs the question of how Unix-related research and development was > legitimized - or played a part in the legitimization of computer science > experimentalism in the scientific field and beyond. We would also like to > highlight practices of resistance, the failure to acknowledge, ignorance of > or even the limits of the Unix system, its software tools and hardware > environment (beginning with the famous PDP and Vax machines from Digital > Equipment where the first Unix versions were implemented). With a focus on > occupational computer uses, we call for analysis which aims to explore and > clarify: > > - the role of developers, users, and user associations – from the point of > view of pioneers as well as helpers, maintainers and other witnesses of the > implementation of Unix; > > - the context, process, and people who determined its propagation, > appropriation, and development over time; > > - the meaning of concepts of Unix philosophy and ethics such as “openness” > and “autonomy”, from a social, political or economic point of view. > > > *2. Philosophical and epistemological perspectives* > > > > We will foster research and reflection at the crossroad of the theoretical > foundations of computer systems and engineering pragmatism, between the > philosophy of computer systems and Unixian practices. > > > > Protagonists in the conception and diffusion of Unix often claim to have a > ‘Unix philosophy’ . But beyond statement of principle, what was the real > influence of this idea on the technical choices underlying the system’s > developments? What are the ethical, moral, and philosophical motivations – > alongside the social, political or economic dimensions discussed earlier – > underpinning the adoption of Unix or pretending to extend it (for instance > in relation to the notions of sharing, modularity or freedom)? How is the > idea of ‘openness’ attached to Unix practices and heritage (free software, > open source) conceived? What are the theoretical developments to be drawn > from it (for instance with the idea of open software)? > > > > The logical and mathematical foundations of Unix should be readdressed. Do > the fundamental concepts of Unix have an ontological or metaphysical > significance beyond the sole research aim of technical efficiency? What > role do aesthetics play in the formulation of general principles and > technical choices? How can we analyze programming languages such as C and > its successors, scripts, software, and generally speaking, the > proliferating source codes of Unix? How do we consider the system, the > software environment, as well as the hardware in which Unix is implemented > and executed? > > > > Such philosophical questions also cover the modalities of the transmission > of Unix, extending to the investigation of the respective roles of theory > and practice in the teaching of the system, the teaching of knowledge and > tools underlying the system or supporting the system. > > > > *3. Unix heritage and ‘heritagization’* > > > > France is now the home to multiple initiatives taking place to build and > preserve a material and immaterial heritage of computer science and > technology – such as ‘Software Heritage’ at INRIA, a global software > archive in progress. The Museum of Arts et Métiers gave impetus to the MINF > initiative (‘Pour un Musée de l’informatique et du numérique’) and > coordinates the ‘Patstec Mission’ dealing with contemporary scientific and > technological heritage preservation, including computer science. At an > international scale and with a grassroots perspective carried by the > community of Unix users, the TUHS (The Unix Heritage Society) demonstrates > the current interest in the specific heritage linked to Unix. We encourage > reflections on this heritage and its specific features: > > > > - What is the place of Unix in the construction of computer science > heritage? Is it possible to map Unix systems and their heritage, from the > standpoint of machines, languages and software? What has already been > collected? What corpus, data bases, and/or platforms with a patrimonial > mission are concerned with Unix and to what purpose? > > - How are the questions of training, constitution and diffusion of a Unix > culture incorporated in the effort to collect heritage? How do we evaluate > and put forward the importance of immaterial heritage attached to Unix, > considering the effects of community and memory in its history and for the > writing of its history? > > - What are the practices and modalities advocated by the unixian heritage > itself? What has been its influence on the field of computer engineering > and research as well as diverse fields such as: popularization of science > and technology, ‘hacker’ movements and many ‘maker’ practices today > (Lallement, 2016)? > > > *Schedules* > > Please send a one-page abstract (maximum 500 words) with a short biography > by June 30, 2017 to: camille.paloque-berges(a)cnam.fr > <camille.paloque-berges(a)lecnam.net> and loic.petitgirard(a)cnam.fr. > Accepted contributions and speakers will be notified by July 15, 2017. > > > *Organizing committee* > > Isabelle Astic (Musée des arts et métiers) > > Raphaël Fournier-S’niehotta (Cédric, Cnam) > > Pierre-Eric Mounier-Kuhn (CRM, Paris 1) > > Camille Paloque-Berges (HT2S, Cnam) > > Loïc Petitgirard (HT2S, Cnam) > > > *Scientific committee * > > François Anceau (UMPC-LIP6) > > Pierre Cubaud (Cédric, Cnam) > > Liesbeth de Mol (STL, Lille 3) > > Claudine Fontanon (CAK, EHESS) > > Gérald Kembellec (DICEN, Cnam) > > Baptiste Mélès (Archives Henri Poincaré, CNRS) > > Pierre Paradinas (Cédric, Cnam, SIF) > Giuseppe Primiero (Middlesex University) > > Lionel Tabourier (LIP6, Paris 6) > > > *Institutional partners and support: * > > - Project « Hist.Pat.info.Cnam », HT2S, Cnam – Research program supported > by the Excellence laboratory History and Anthropology of Knoweldge, > Technics and Beliefs (HASTEC), and in partnership with the laboratories > CEDRIC (Cnam), DICEN (Cnam), and the Center Alexandre Koyré (EHESS). > > - « Histoire de l’informatique » (« History of computing » seminar) > seminar - (Musée des arts et métiers, CRM, Paris 1, UMPC-LIP6) > > - « Source code » seminar - (CNRS, Cnam, Université Paris 6). > > With support from the DHST/DLMPST for the History and Philosophy of > Computing (HAPOC) > > > *Bibliography * > > Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. *Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free > Software*. Durham: Duke University Press Books. > > > > Lallement, Michel. 2016. *L’âge du faire, *Seuil. > > > > Mélès, Baptiste. 2003. « Unix selon l’ordre des raisons : la philosophie > de la pratique informatique ». *Philosophia Scientiæ* 17 (3): 181‑98. > > > > Salus, Peter H. 1994. *A quarter century of UNIX*. Addison-Wesley. > Reading. > > > > Toomey, Warren. 2010. « First Edition Unix: Its Creation and > Restoration ». *IEEE Annals of the History of Computing* 32 (3): 74‑82. > > > > > -- Institutional email address : camille.paloque_berges(a)cnam.fr *Laboratory for the History of Techno-Sciences (HT2S), Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, 2 rue Conté, 75003 Paris, France *Associate researcher at the Digital Paths cluster of CNRS' Institute for Communication Sciences (ISCC)

1 0

Digital Equipment Corporation Collection at the Computer History Museum
by David C. Brock 14 Jun '17

14 Jun '17

Dear List: The Computer History Museum is pleased to announce that our Digital Equipment Corporation collection is open for research. The Digital Equipment Corporation records are 1,239 linear feet of material in 1,343 boxes. The records represent the largest and most complete set of DEC records in existence, dating from 1947 through 2002, with the bulk from the company’s years of operation from 1957 through 1998, when they were bought by Compaq Computer. The collection is a comprehensive technical history of every major computing innovation at DEC, as well as its nontraditional business culture. The finding aid for the collection may be found here: http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/finding-aids/10273… Information about accessing the collection may be found here: http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/requests/ To read more about the collection, see https://medium.com/@computerhistory/what-the-dec-6d9f92d172bf .............. David C. Brock Director Center for Software History [http://www.computerhistory.org/softwarehistory/] Computer History Museum [http://www.computerhistory.org/] Email: dbrock(a)computerhistory.org Twitter: @dcbrock Skype: dcbrock 1401 N. Shoreline Blvd. Mountain View, CA 94943 (650) 810-1010 main (650) 810-1886 direct Follow Us: @CHM Blog [http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/] Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/computerhistory] Twitter [https://twitter.com/ComputerHistory] Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/computerhistory/] YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/user/ComputerHistory] Make Software, Change the World! Now Open. [http://www.computerhistory.org/exhibits/makesoftware/]

1 0

Call for volunteers: community moderators for SIGCIS listserv
by Andrew Russell 06 Jun '17

06 Jun '17

Dear colleagues and community members, The SIGCIS executive committee was deeply troubled by the inappropriate messages posted to the list two weeks ago. We are working to make changes so the list is a better space for discussing scholarship on gender, sexuality, race, and other categories of difference. Those changes include: 1. The SIGCIS Exec is currently re-writing the listserv's Acceptable Use Policy to encourage a more positive and generative tone. 2. The SIGCIS Exec is seeking volunteers to serve on a team of community moderators. As we are now an online group with over 550+ members, the SIGCIS Exec feels that moderators can help to ease tensions, negotiate conflict, and, if necessary, address violations of the revised Acceptable Use Policy. The exact duties of this team, along with the responsibilities of individual moderators, would be established with input from the volunteers themselves. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Previous experience in online moderation or community management would be especially valuable, but it is not required. We have a LOT of knowledge within the SIGCIS members about online communities and their maintenance, and we’re hoping to use some of that knowledge to the benefit of the SIGCIS community. Many thanks, Andy Russell SIGCIS Chair — — — — — — — — — — — Andrew L. Russell, Ph.D. Dean, College of Arts & Sciences SUNY Polytechnic Institute Donovan Hall - 2123B 100 Seymour Road Utica, NY 13502 t. 315-792-7317 w. https://sunypoly.edu/ e. arussell(a)arussell.org

1 0

Limited Release of Individual Announcements and CFPs to SIGCIS List
by Gallo, Jason A 03 Jun '17

03 Jun '17

Dear SIGCIS Members, While the SIGCIS officers revise the Acceptable Use Policy for the SIGCIS list, we are permitting circulation of announcements and calls for papers on a case-by-case basis. A note to this affect should accompany each release to the list. However, based on your settings (including digest settings), this note may appear as attachment rather than appended to each individual message. Thank you for your patience and forbearance. Best regards, Jason Gallo

1 0

CFP: ARPANET (1969-2019)
by Niels Brügger 31 May '17

31 May '17

CFP: ARPANET (1969-2019) Special issue of Internet Histories. Digital Technology, Culture and Society (Camille Paloque-Berges & Valérie Schafer (eds.)). Read more here https://web90.hypotheses.org/3755 This call for papers aims at revisiting the history of ARPANET, its genesis, development, heritage, memories and the writing of its history 50 years after the first four nodes came into service. ARPANET’s story is today part of the Internet’s official heritage, as a first crucial step in its development. Seminal research, such as Janet Abbate’s Inventing the Internet (1999) or Alexandre Serres’ Aux sources d’Internet: l’émergence d’ARPANET (2000) has extensively covered its history. However, the 50th anniversary of ARPANET provides an occasion to reflect on existing histories, to open the debate to new perspectives and approaches. What have these pioneering researchers provided and what lessons have they taught us in terms of studying the history of computer networks? When considering ARPANET as a first step towards the Internet: how did this determine – and is still determining – our current understanding of the Internet and of the ARPANET? What other chronologies and territories involving the ARPANET can be advanced? What is left to explore and discover in the ARPANET’s history? If the ARPANET is dead today, are its heritage and spirit still alive and if so, how? Suggested topics: * The ARPANET’s inspirations: previous concepts, models, theories, technologies * Development of computer networks from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s: society, culture, politics and economics in the ARPANET’s times (from a local, national and international perspective) * The place of ARPANET in the history of ARPA/DARPA or funding agencies more generally * The place of ARPANET within the history of military networks * Trajectories of ARPANET’s developments: from experiments to achievements, through mistakes and failures * ARPANET’s communities: from developers to users * ARPANET’s hardware and software within the history of computers and computing * Famous and less-known protagonists or witnesses of ARPANET * Spaces, places, maps, territories, geographies, and geopolitics of ARPANET * Communicating with, through, and about ARPANET * ARPANET as a model: reception and influence on other networks and/or in other countries * ARPANET’s governance and architecture * ARPANET and infrastructures for digital information * ARPANET’s cultures: perimeters, specificities, limits … * The history of networks shaping collaborative work * Writing ARPANET’s history: critical historiography, methodology, epistemological issues * New discoveries in the history of ARPANET * ARPANET’s heritage in the present Internet and digital cultures Of course, we encourage and welcome other topics and perspectives on ARPANET’s history too. The proposals are to be submitted to camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com<mailto:camillepaloqueberges@gmail.com> valerieschafer(a)wanadoo.fr<mailto:valerieschafer@wanadoo.fr> explicitly mentioning CFP ARPANET. They need to fit in one page, detail an explicit angle of analysis and outline, and integrate a short bibliography. Successful authors will be invited to submit then a full paper through the editorial system, which will undergo full peer review and will determine acceptance of papers for publication. Deadline for the submission of proposals: October 15th 2017 Notification of proposal acceptance: November 15th 2017 Submissions of the full paper (6000-8000 words): April 15th 2018 Feedback based on reviews: June 30th 2018 Deadline for Revisions: October 15th 2018 Internet Histories: Digital Technology, Culture and Society is an international, interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal concerned with research on the cultural, social, political and technological histories of the internet and associated digital cultures. More information on the journal can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journal… Instructions for Authors are available at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journa… Should you have any questions regarding this CfP, please feel free to contact us: camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com<mailto:camillepaloqueberges@gmail.com> valerieschafer(a)wanadoo.fr<mailto:valerie.schafer@cnrs.fr> —————————————————————————————— NEW JOURNAL: Internet Histories—Digital Technology, Culture and Society, inaugural issue (1(1-2)) OUT NOW, http://tandfonline.com/loi/rint20<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftandfonline.com%2Floi%2Frint20&h…> LATEST PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS The Web as History: Using Web Archives to Understand the Past and the Present (eds. N. Brügger, R. Schroeder). London: UCL Press, 2017 Download FREE copy: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/the-web-as-history Probing a nation’s web domain: A new approach to web history and a new kind of historical source. In G. Goggin, M. McLelland (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Global Internet Histories (pp. 61-73). New York/Abingdon: Routledge 2017. Webraries and Web Archives: The Web between public and private. In D. Baker, W. Ewans (Eds.), The End of Wisdom?: The Future of Libraries in a Digital Age (pp. 185–190). Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2017. Pre-pub versions: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312006853_Webraries_and_Web_Archiv… https://www.academia.edu/30729119/Webraries_and_Web_Archives_The_Web_betwee… Digital Humanities. In K.B. Jensen, R.T. Craig, J. Pooley, E. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (vol. 1, pp. 548-556). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell/The International Communication Association (ICA), 2016 Digital Humanities in the 21st Century: Digital Material as a Driving Force, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 10(3), 2016 Read article: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000256/000256.html The Web’s first 25 years (guest editor and Introduction), New Media & Society, 18(7), 2016 Read more: http://nms.sagepub.com/content/18/7 A brief history of Facebook as a media text: The development of an empty structure, First Monday, 20(5), 2015 Read article: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5423 NIELS BRÜGGER, Professor (MSO, with special responsibilities), PhD Head of the Centre for Internet Studies, and of NetLab School of Communication and Culture Aarhus University Helsingforsgade 14, building 5347, room 236 8200 Aarhus N Denmark Phone (switchboard) +45 8715 0000 Phone (direct) +45 8716 1971 Phone (mobile) +45 2945 3231 E-mail nb(a)cc.au.dk<mailto:nb@dac.au.dk> Webpage http://imv.au.dk/~nb Profile at LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/50a/555 Skype name: niels_bruegger Orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-1980<http://Orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-1980> The Centre for Internet Studies, http://cfi.au.dk NetLab, http://netlab.dk RESAW, a Research Infrastructure for the Study of Archived Web Material, http://resaw.eu

1 0

Fwd: [ATHENA] Appel Ã contributions revue Internet hist ories : Arpanet (1969-2019)
by Andrew Butrica 29 May '17

29 May '17

>X-Original-To: athena(a)services.cnrs.fr >Delivered-To: athena(a)services.cnrs.fr >X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t2gpsmtp1.dsi.cnrs.fr >Authentication-Results: t2gpsmtp1.dsi.cnrs.fr (amavisd-new); > dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com >X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=1e100.net; s=20161025; > h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; > bh=+EwGbfBxHBm6XTHk6E6U2GMqvGHHffBq+MGjO1IdNxs=; > b=TewVOpQUfwC2ZWB4nyEKAXK4oNX2ZCAram86+4OQcOpzPjY33/su4Q+FDi8KgiRS3h > T0jF6PeOCYLBV+guveBJ9LULfLty0yQtO2QHmEd7AXwYckaZY7t00YxID48loGjdlyzi > 6eaTDPZczW9qZpN7vZGBLA5Jr5tF3WCCD6MQ5/vAqBooaBG+KJBRDPmDaXpXoTkAMtXt > HW5FGphvLJv+FUdnDBb9Yh9PGM3E/StBa2ltKCLQJf3NBLHzWhTcQVYdzv8I8hvJKYny > KCdwk8U/r/JFertiClJeHnkvox82L+lkBx3jSqCmoaU5CwJWONQojqdXplsbIouleDp5 > UhIA== >X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAz6wlfAmLdrz++uzJhyAlOMi2ReilNRZO2dlQ9K/ANtOpuH4+T > jtnGZO0BQONB10rovfGundPedYc8NLtu >X-Received: by 10.159.49.87 with SMTP id n23mr7261612uab.117.1496044415835; > Mon, 29 May 2017 00:53:35 -0700 (PDT) >From: "Camille Paloque-Berges" >(camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com) <athena(a)services.cnrs.fr> >Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:53:05 +0200 >To: athena(a)services.cnrs.fr >X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20161025; > h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; > bh=+EwGbfBxHBm6XTHk6E6U2GMqvGHHffBq+MGjO1IdNxs=; > b=UOGt2J75gVpWGGrX2/sPDiY+G2O8kgX21jW++znqdvcQTwMe0alAs78ZJobajnv809 > TOKfA/TptRSPRP8OlNOG7WJWVvPwSPNpKwNBtGtJ1Ww0h8aB30r4UQScDfSbtFM+2xOl > ghgjVrD90pZRxnTQdshfRf1hPlPvD8VLE0nbFQbDpLq9rAESxeocxUvr3CO9FSw62L+d > +M5n+YyUtt6clvCLF0BDhZQu59aqomPOQsyL6ropkekPt0EVAhJAntH4uICzRoxpzVoj > 1T4fqdfIHMkUJmU2mw1LPFiQBE+xdfvKRTtxuITLDcJcse2InXPXXJnMknYPWdzqGgsQ > ko2A== >Reply-To: camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com >X-Original-From: Camille Paloque-Berges <camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com> >Subject: [ATHENA] Appel Ã contributions revue Internet hist > ories : Arpanet (1969-2019) >X-Loop: athena(a)services.cnrs.fr >X-Sequence: 463 >Sender: athena-request(a)services.cnrs.fr >X-no-archive: yes >List-Id: <athena.services.cnrs.fr> >List-Archive: <https://listes.services.cnrs.fr/wws/arc/athena> >List-Help: <mailto:sympa@services.cnrs.fr?subject=help> >List-Owner: <mailto:athena-request@services.cnrs.fr> >List-Post: <mailto:athena@services.cnrs.fr> >List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@services.cnrs.fr?subject=subscribe%20athena> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@services.cnrs.fr?subject=unsubscribe%20athena> >X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0; >X-Authentication-Results: dkim="fail"; (2:no or >failed dkim processing); dmarc="none"; (1); dwl="miss"; den="not exempt" >X-ELNK-AV: 0 >X-ELNK-Info: sbv=1; sbrc=-0; sbf=cb; sbw=000; > >Cher.e.s collÃ¨gues,Â > >Vous trouverez ci-dessous un appel Ã articles >de la revue Internet histories dÃ©diÃ© >Ã lâhistoire d'Arpanet dont nous espÃ©rons >quâil sera susceptible de vous intÃ©resser.Â > >TrÃ¨s cordialement,Â > >Camille Paloque-Berges et ValÃ©rie SchaferÂ > > > >Call For Papers: ARPANET (1969-2019) > >Camille Paloque-Berges & ValÃ©rie Schafer (ed.)Â > >Â > >Special issue ofÂ Internet Histories. Digital Technology, Culture and Society. >Â Â > >This call for papers aims at revisiting the >history of ARPANET, its genesis, development, >heritage, memories and the writing of its >history 50 years after the first four nodes came into service. > >ARPANETâs story is today part of the >Internetâs official heritage, as a first >crucial step in its development. Seminal >research, such as Janet AbbateâsÂ Inventing >the InternetÂ (1999) or Alexandre SerresâÂ Aux >sources dâInternet: lâÃ©mergence >dâARPANETÂ (2000) has extensively covered its >history. However, the 50thÂ anniversary of >ARPANET provides an occasion to reflect on >existing histories, to open the debate to new perspectives and approaches. Â > >What have these pioneering researchers provided >and what lessons have they taught us in terms of >studying the history of computer networks? When >considering ARPANET as a first step towards the >Internet: how did this determine and is still >determining our current understanding of the >Internet and of the ARPANET? Whaat other >chronologies and territories involving the >ARPANET can be advanced? What is left to explore >and discover in the ARPANETâs history? If the >ARPANET is dead today, are its heritage and spirit still alive and if so, how? > >Suggested topics:Â > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The ARPANETâs >inspirations:Â previous concepts, models, theories, technologies > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Development of computer networks >from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s: society, >culture, politics and economics in the >ARPANETâs times (from a local, national and international perspective) > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The place of ARPANET in the >history of ARPA/DARPA or funding agencies more generally > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The place of ARPANET within the history of military networks > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Trajectories of ARPANETâs >developments: from experiments to achievements, through mistakes and failures > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANETâs communities: from developers to users > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANETâs hardware and software >within the history of computers and computingÂ > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Famous and less-known protagonists or witnesses of ARPANETÂ > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Spaces, places, maps, >territories, geographies, and geopolitics of ARPANET > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Communicating with, through, and about ARPANETÂ > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANET as a model: reception and >influence on other networks and/or in other countries > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANETâs governance and architecture > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANET and infrastructures for digital information > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANETâs cultures: perimeters, specificities, limits > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The history of networks shaping collaborative work > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Writing ARPANETâs history: >critical historiography, methodology, epistemological issues > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â New discoveries in the history of ARPANET > >-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ARPANETâs heritage in the >present Internet and digital cultures >Â > >Of course, we encourage and welcome other topics >and perspectives on ARPANETâs history too.Â >Â Â > >Â Submissions > >The proposals are to be submitted toÂ > ><mailto:camillepaloqueberges@gmail.com>camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com > ><mailto:valerieschafer@wanadoo.fr>valerieschafer(a)wanadoo.fr > >explicitly mentioningÂ CFP ARPANET.Â >Â > >They need to fit in one page, detail an explicit >angle of analysis and outline, and integrate a short bibliography.Â > >Successful authors will be invited to submit >then a full paperÂ through the editorial system, >which will undergo full peer review and will >determine acceptance of papers for publication. >Â > >Calendar > >Deadline for the submission of proposals: October 15thÂ 2017Â > >Notification of proposal acceptance: November 15thÂ 2017Â > >Submissions of the full paper (6000-8000 words): April 15thÂ 2018Â > >Feedback based on reviews: June 30thÂ 2018Â > >Deadline for Revisions: October 15thÂ 2018 >Â > >Internet Histories: Digital Technology, Culture >and SocietyÂ is an international, >inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal >concerned with research on the cultural, social, >political and technological histories of the >internet and associated digital cultures. >Â > >More information on the journal can be found atÂ > ><http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journal…>http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journal… >Â > >Instructions for Authors are available at > ><http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journa…>http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journa… >Â > >Should you have any questions regarding this >CfP, please feel free to contact us:Â > ><mailto:camillepaloqueberges@gmail.com>camillepaloqueberges(a)gmail.com > ><mailto:valerie.schafer@cnrs.fr>valerieschafer(a)wanadoo.fr >Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >Institutional email address :Â ><mailto:camille.paloque_berges@cnam.fr>camille.paloque_berges(a)cnam.fr >*Laboratory for the History of Techno-Sciences >(HT2S),Â Conservatoire national des arts et >mÃ©tiers, 2 rue ContÃ©, 75003 Paris, France >*Associate researcher at theÂ Digital Paths >cluster ofÂ CNRS' Institute for Communication Sciences (ISCC)Â >==== >ATHENA : la liste de diffusion d'informations et >d'actualitÃ©s scientifiques en histoire des techniques. > >Le site web de la liste : https://listes.services.cnrs.fr/wws/info/athena >Pour gÃ©rer votre abonnement : https://listes.services.cnrs.fr/wws/pref >Pour envoyer un message Ã la liste : athena(a)services.cnrs.fr > >Cette liste de diffusion est hÃ©bergÃ©e, gÃ©rÃ©e >et financÃ©e par le centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS). Andrew J. Butrica, Ph.D. Research Historian Sent from my Xylo Phone

1 0

Call for Papers: Workshop "Algorithmische Wissenskulturen? Der Einfluss des Computers auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung" München, 12.10.2017 – 14.10.2017
by Alberts, Gerard 28 May '17

28 May '17

Dear Colleagues, even if the Munich Workshop will be German-spoken, you will want to know about, and may want to participate in, our workshop Cultures of Algorithmic Knowledge. It focuses more specifically on the impact of computers in the realm of the sciences. Hope to see you in October, Gerard Alberts Workshop: Algorithmische Wissenskulturen? Der Einfluss des Computers auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung Datum: Do.,12.10.2017 – Sa.,14.10.2017 Ort: Deutsches Museum, München Organisation: Ulf Hashagen (Deutsches Museum/ LMU München) Rudolf Seising (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena/Deutsches Museum) Gerard Alberts (Universität Amsterdam) Gabriele Gramelsberger (Universität Witten-Herdecke) Bewerbungsschluss 15.06.2017 Url http://www.deutsches-museum.de/forschung/aktuelles/tagungen/2017/ Call for Papers: Lange vor dem Aufkommen der „Digital Humanities“ und dem „Big Data“-Hype hat der Computer begonnen, die Wissenschaften zu revolutionieren. Dieser Prozess setzte Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts ein und hat sich in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten nicht nur erheblich beschleunigt, sondern grundlegende methodische Veränderungen in den Wissenschaften mit sich gebracht. Inzwischen hat diese Entwicklung in unserer gegenwärtigen Wissenschaftswelt eine derartige Bedeutung gewonnen, dass die Europäische Union im Jahr 2013 die Vision von „Digital Science“ in das Programm „Horizon 2020“ integrierte und dabei von einer “radical transformation of the nature of science“ sprach. Schon seit der Herausbildung des modernen Wissenschaftssystems im 19. Jahrhundert existierten in Teilen der Natur- und Technikwissenschaften weit ausgeprägte algorithmische Wissenskulturen. Dies galt vor allem für die Astronomie und Geodäsie, die als empirische Wissenschaften neben Theorie und Datenerhebung durch Beobachtung bzw. Experiment auch über eine ausgebildete Rechenkultur verfügten, die als dritte grundlegende Methode für die Erklärung und Vorhersage von Naturphänomenen diente. Die Entwicklung von algorithmisierten numerischen Methoden war für die Wissenschaftler zentraler Teil ihrer disziplinären Agenda. Die Anwendung der Rechenverfahren wurde mehr und mehr institutionalisiert und dabei menschlichen Rechnern – im englischen Sprachraum auch als human computers bezeichnet – übertragen, die die Massendaten („Input“) auswerteten und für Vorhersagen („Output“) nutzten. Als Hilfsmittel dienten papierne Datenbanken (Tafelwerke), aus denen die Rechner neue papierne Datenbanken (Tafelwerke) als wissenschaftliche Publikationen erzeugten. Im frühen 20. Jahrhundert setzte eine Mechanisierung dieser Verfahren ein, bei der Rechenmaschinen von human computers genutzt bzw. deren Aufgaben gänzlich durch Hollerithmaschinen erledigt wurden. Dem Aufkommen maschinenbasierter Rechenkulturen folgte bald ihr Aufstieg in anderen Wissenschaftsfeldern wie Meteorologie, Klimatologie, Hydrologie, Statistik, Ballistik und Luftfahrtwissenschaften. Die Erfindung des Computers in den 1940er Jahren scheint zunächst keine breitenwirksamen und systematischen Veränderungen in den algorithmischen Wissenskulturen ausgelöst zu haben. Erst in den 1960er Jahren setze ein allgemeiner Prozess ein, der zu einer breiten Verwendung des Computers in den Natur- und Ingenieurwissenschaften führte, wobei dieser zunächst als äußerst schnelle, programmierbare Rechenmaschine Verwendung fand. In den folgenden Jahrzehnten wuchs die Bedeutung von algorithmischen Wissenskulturen in den einzelnen Disziplinen teilweise enorm stark an – bis hin zu Disziplinen wie den Klimawissenschaften, die auf der Verwendung von Computern basieren. Dieser wissenschafts- und technikhistorische Workshop will sich den Fragen widmen, welche grundlegenden und methodischen Veränderungen der Computer in der Wissenschaftspraxis und im Agenda-Setting der einzelnen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen mit sich brachte, und wie er algorithmischen Wissenskulturen in einzelnen Disziplinen transformierte bzw. neuartige algorithmische Wissenskulturen entstehen ließ. Allgemeiner ließe sich fragen, wie der Computer als Maschine, Werkzeug und Medium die Entwicklung der Wissenschaften beeinflusst hat. Welche neuen methodischen Möglichkeiten der mathematischen Modellierung, der Simulation und der Datenanalyse resultierten daraus? Wie ist das Phänomen der Computersimulation historisch einzuordnen? Kann sie heute quasi als „dritter Weg“ neben Theorie und Experiment in den Natur- und Ingenieurwissenschaften angesehen werden? Inwieweit ist der Algorithmus das wissenserzeugende Element in dieser Entwicklung? Wir laden wissenschaftshistorische, technikhistorische, wissenschaftssoziologische sowie wissenschaftsphilosophische Beiträge ein, die algorithmischen Wissenskulturen und die Veränderungen der Wissenschaften durch den Computer im 20. Jahrhundert thematisieren. Die zeitliche Perspektive grenzen wir in der Regel ein auf die historischen Entwicklungen vom frühen 20. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart ein. Erbeten werden bis zum 15. Juni 2017 Exposés in einem Umfang von maximal 5.000 Zeichen (zu richten an r.seising(a)lrz.uni-muenchen.de<mailto:r.seising@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> und an U.Hashagen(a)lrz.uni-muenchen.de<mailto:U.Hashagen@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>). Für Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer mit einem akzeptierten Vortrag kann eine Reisekostenunterstützung in Aussicht gestellt werden. Vorgesehen ist, auf der Basis der Vorträge im Jahr 2018 einen konzeptionell möglichst geschlossenen Band mit ausgewählten, qualitativ hochwertigen Beiträgen in einem renommierten Wissenschaftsverlag zu publizieren. Daher soll auf dem Workshop eine ausführliche inhaltliche und methodische Diskussion der Beiträge und des Gesamtkonzepts erfolgen.

1 0