March 2014 - Members - lists.sigcis.org

My column on Turing and the Invention of the Computer
by Thomas Haigh 12 May '14

12 May '14

Hello everyone, You may be interested in my newly published Communications of the ACM Column "Actually, Turing Did Not Invent the Computer." (It was supposed to be "didn't'" but I think that was an informality too far for the ACM). You can read it at http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2014/1/170862-actually-turing-did-not-invent-t he-computer/abstract. Or if you do not have an ACM subscription, http://www.tomandmaria.com/tom/Writing/CACMActuallyTuringDidNotInventTheComp uter.pdf. This had its origins in my presentation of some of my ongoing work on ENIAC over the summer, where I was discussing the different clusters of ideas found in von Neumann's 1945 "First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC." I'd expected that any questions about the attribution of these ideas to von Neumann would come from partisans shouting that he had merely stolen the ideas of Eckert and Mauchly and had preemptively noted that while the credit for these ideas had been disputed the impact of the report hadn't. Instead, all anyone wanted to talk about was how von Neumann had taken the ideas from. Turing! Further investigation revealed that a series of increasingly tenuous claims about the similarity between Turing's famous paper and the "First Draft" had been spreading in recent years, reaching a peak with Turing's recent centenary. Professionally trained historians of computing largely moved on from the events of the 1940s a generation ago, leaving the history of early computing to computer scientists, philosophers, logicians, and the partisans of various famous machines and their inventors. (This is beginning to change again, fortunately). I think also that the public really has room in its collective memory for just one famous person per technology, usually its inventor. Thus if someone has heard of Turing doing something famous with computers then they are likely to assume he invented the computer. Hence the need for a concise and balanced assessment of the actual situation. The paper is indebted to discussions with many of you on this topic, including Paul Ceruzzi, David Hemmendinger, Edgar G. Daylight, Pierre Mounier Kuhn, and my collaborator on the ENIAC project Mark Priestley. Best wishes, Tom

5 5

Resources re: history of menus in computing?
by Laine Nooney 03 Apr '14

03 Apr '14

Hi all, I'm currently pulling together a short essay for a game history lexicon on the emergence of the menu in games. This topic is running me a bit in circles--menus seem to be one of those components that are so "obvious," or taken for granted in the game dev realm, that they aren't deeply, explicitly talked about. I'm wondering what the respective literature around "menus" might be in the history of computing. Are there obvious touchstones or definitive transitions to be aware of (especially beyond the visible PARC/Apple/Windows GUI histories)? And to be clear, I'm trying to keep this distinct from UI issues (insofar as that's possible!) Any leads, food for thought, or general chatter would be much appreciated! Best, Laine Nooney Department of Cultural Analysis and Theory Stony Brook University Editorial Assistant to the Journal of Visual Culture vcu.sagepub.com www.lainenooney.com

4 3

2014 Computer History Museum Prize (Oustanding Book), 15 May deadline
by Thomas Haigh 28 Mar '14

28 Mar '14

Hello everyone, The 2014 call for submissions for our Computer History Museum book prize is online at http://www.sigcis.org/chmprize and pasted below. Please spread the word. Also remember that there is a three year window, so even if you nominated a book without success last year it could well pay off to resubmit it. This window this year is for books with first publication in English in 2011, 2012, or 2013. We are particularly glad that last years winner, Joe November, has agreed to join the jury this year. Please address any questions to this years chair, David Nofre. Tom. Computer History Museum Prize 2014 Call for Submissions The Computer History Museum Prize is awarded to the author of an outstanding book in the history of computing broadly conceived, published during the prior three years. The prize of $1,000 is awarded by SIGCIS, the Special Interest Group for Computers, Information and Society. SIGCIS is part of the Society for the History of Technology. Books published in 2011-2013 are eligible for the 2014 award. Books in translation are eligible for three years following the date of their publication in English. Publishers, authors, and other interested members of the computer history community are invited to nominate books. Send one copy of the nominated title to each of the committee members listed below. To be considered, book submissions must be postmarked by 15 May 2014 For more information, please contact the prize committee chair. Current information about the prize, including the most recent call and a list of previous winners, may always be found at http://www.sigcis.org/chmprize. In 2012 the prize was endowed in perpetuity through a generous bequest from the estate of Paul Baran, a legendary computer innovator and entrepreneur best known for his work to develop and promote the packet switching approach on which modern networks are built. Baran was a longtime supporter of work on the history of information technology and named the prize to celebrate the contributions of the Computer History Museum to that field. 2014 Prize Committee Members Rebecca Slayton: Lecturer in Public Polic, Stanford University, 616 Serra Street, Stanford, CA 94305-6055. rslayton(a)stanford.edu David Nofre (chair): Research Affiliate, Centre d'Estudis d'Història de la Ciència at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Send books to him at Kleyn Proffijtlaan 47, 2343DB Oegstgeest, Netherlands d.nofre(a)gmail.com Joseph A. November: Associate Professor, University of South Carolina, Department of History, 817 Henderson St., Gambrell Hall, Room 245, Columbia, SC 29208. november(a)sc.edu Previous Winners * 2009: Christophe Lécuyer <http://www.sigcis.org/node/89> , Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930-1970 (MIT Press, 2006) * 2010: Atsushi Akera <http://www.sigcis.org/node/133> , Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers, and Computers During the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research (MIT Press, 2007) * 2011: <http://www.sigcis.org/node/320> Paul N. Edwards, A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2010). * 2012: Eden Medina <http://www.sigcis.org/node/365> , Cybernetic Revolutionaries:Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile (MIT Press, 2011). * 2013: Joseph A. Novembe <http://www.sigcis.org/node/383> r. Biomedical Computing: Digitizing Life in the United States (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012

1 0

My article "Reconsidering the Stored Program Concept" published in Annals
by Thomas Haigh 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Hello everyone, The most recent Annals includes the first of a trilogy of ENIAC-related articles, written with Mark Priestley and Crispin Rope. It's called "Reconsidering the Stored Program Concept." If you have ever wondered "what is the stored program concept?" or "why is it so important" or "where did that phrase come from" then this tries to provide some answers. You may remember some discussion on this list back in 2012 on the question of when and how the phrase was introduced, which is one of many ways in which our efforts on this project have benefitted from the support of the SIGCIS community. Thanks to all those who commented on earlier versions, steered us to sources, or shared their thoughts with us, including Peggy Kidwell, Paul Lasewicz, Dawn Stanford, William Aspray, Atsushi Akera, Paul Ceruzzi, David Hemmendinger, Martin Campbell-Kelly, Gerard Alberts, Liesbeth De Mol, Allan Olley, David Alan Grier, Ulf Hashagen and Doron Swade. Annals needs all the hits in the IEEE CS digital library it can find, so if you have access please get it from there at http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MAHC.2013.56 If not, there is a copy on my personal site at http://www.tomandmaria.com/tom/Writing/ReconsideringTheStoredProgramConcept. pdf. Sharing news of publications is one of the functions of the list, so please do let the community for anything relevant that you have published. As always, links are better than attachments. Best wishes, Tom

1 0

EMAIL and group communications
by Murray Turoff 25 Mar '14

25 Mar '14

Email has a fascinating real history. EMISARI at OEP in 1971 had synchronous and asynchronous conferencing, it had a written chat sysetm and it had email, it also had notebooks that allowed collaborative writers and also readers who could not write. A manual is on the NJIT library website i gave in my past message. Email existed at that time on the ARPA net and they refused to give me any data on its use. It was apparent they did not want any data to reach congress that showed that email was the single biggest applications on the ARPA net since congress might think that all the money would go for replacing the 10 cent telephone. Scientific Timesharing was the first company that claimed they used email to run their company. Some of us would use a GE timehsaring Basic system to talk to each other between different countries. You could leave a message by creating a program named for who you were sending to and what number the message was and using REMARK statements to contain the message. We could deal with discussions of 3-7 fairly well. Message systems spread because technical people added them and there was no conscious upper management policy or guidelines. At least two major computer companies almost tore out their message system when a diverse group of their best professionals wrote an anti management document countering a policy decision about use of technology in their products that the professional group disagreed with after the decision was made pubic. There was up to six months of investigation in one company before they decided not to pull out the existing message systems. Then some months later in both cases management reversed their original policy and adopted what the professionals wanted in the plans for future products. The Delphi Method book, which Linstone and I did in 1975 had a final chapter on online group communication efforts and the potential for online Delphis in 1975 (it is free on my website http://is.njit.edu/turoff ) In 2011 a special issue of TFSC on Delphi had an article on the evolution of Delphi as part of a special issue on Delphi Linstone, Harold & Turoff, Murray, Delphi: A brief look backward and forward, Technological Forecasting and social Change, (2011), 2010.09.011 (prediction markets is a delphi system but the people doing it never figured that out). We observed that currently the WEB has brought about "the age of participation" (social networks and things like amazon, ebay), however, what is needed is to strive for is an "age of collaboration" which is really what Delphi is about. Currently a group of us have been creating a Delphi system that allows a group of professionals to collaboratively build dynamic scenario models for planning in Emergency Management. But it can be used in any planning situation. Can send anyone interested a recent paper to be published in May. -- *please send messages to murray.turoff(a)gmail.com <murray.turoff(a)gmail.com> do not use @njit.edu <http://njit.edu> addressDistinguished Professor EmeritusInformation Systems, NJIThomepage: http://is.njit.edu/turoff <http://is.njit.edu/turoff>*

1 0

Menus, the "Inventor of Email," and his book
by Thomas Haigh 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

Hello SIGCIS, Murray's posts on menus in his early computer conferencing systems reminds me that Shiva Ayyadurai's "EMAIL" system, circa 1980, appeared from the documentation he posted online to use two letter command codes with menu prompts. That is not offered as any evidence of novelty, but it took me back to thinking about the system. You may recall my involvement two years ago with the effort to debunk some rather credulous press coverage given to Ayyadurai's vigorous attempts to brand himself as the "inventor of email." http://www.sigcis.org/ayyadurai Last September I updated my page on his claims to include a section on his book The Email Revolution: Unleashing the Power to Connect (Allworth, 2013). That is pasted below, for those interested. The book has not received very much attention, though Ayyadurai has been back in the news as the <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2476376/Fran-Drescher-goes-bra less-outing-toyboy-Los-Angeles.html> "toy boy" or <http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/fran-drescher-steps-out-with- new-boyfriend-shiva-ayyadurai-email-inventor-of-email-picture-20131610> "email male" lover of sitcom actress Fran Drescher, best known for her starting role on "The Nanny." Tom _____ Part 3: Update including Ayyadurai's book The Email Revolution, September 2013 The world of electronic mail history was fairly quiet over the last year. Journalists have seemed less inclined to endorse V A Shiva Ayyadurai's claims, though his website did sprout a new link to a podcast with an Australian radio interviewer in which he reiterated his standard talking points. In September 2012 the publication date for Ayyadurai's book came and went, and its status on Amazon <http://www.amazon.com/EMAIL-Revolution-Brands-Create-Connections/dp/1581159 803> shifted straight from "preorder" to "out of stock - limited availability." He appeared to be focusing his indisputable energy on the world of alternative medicine, trumpeting a set of alternative medicine courses on "VA Shiva's Systems Health - The Medicine of the Future" sold under the auspices of Deepak Choprah's thriving "wellbeing" empire. Ayyadurai was also proud of his involvement with Cohopra and other alternative medicine celebrities in the 2013 <http://www.chopra.com/programs/journey-into-healing/journey-into-healing-ma rch-14-17-2013> "Journey into Healing" event. Recent Media Appearances During the summer of 2013, however, Ayyadurai returned to the world of electronic mail with a new wave of media appearance in India, apparently from some kind of speaking tour including an <https://chennai.tie.org/event/13/tie-chennai-invites-you-evening-dr-va-shiv a-ayyadurai-inventor-email> "Evening with Dr. VA Shiva Ayyadurai, Inventor of Email" at TiE Chennai. These included * <http://zeenews.india.com/business/news/technology/chennai-born-shiva-ayyadu rai-claims-credit-for-developing-first-e-mail-system_79853.html> "Chennai-born Shiva Ayyadurai Claims Credit for Developing First E-mail System," Zeenews.com * <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Forgotten-email-patent-hold er-pings-Chennai/articleshow/21156019.cms> "Forgotten Email Patent Holder Pings Chennai," The Times of India, July 19, 2013. * <http://newindianexpress.com/education/edex/Youve-got-mail/2013/09/02/articl e1760029.ece> "You've Got Mail," New India Express, 2nd Sept 2013. The claims made in them closely mirror those given in earlier interviews. Some reports appeal explicitly to ethnic sentiment, for example the claim in <http://www.legalera.in/news-deals/highlights/intellectual-property/item/964 1-shiva-ayyadurai-of-tamil-nadu-has-a-patent-for-email-and-is-fighting-to-be -recognized-for-it> "Shiva Ayyadurai of Tamil Nadu has a patent for email and is fighting to be recognized for it" that "the US will not allow an Indian, especially someone who was living in Newark, one of the poorest cities there, to get credit." Ayyadurai's Book Finally Arrives Then, in September 13, Ayyadurai's book The Email Revolution: Unleashing the Power to Connect (Allworth, 2013) finally popped up as published via a second Amazon listing. According to a quotation on the dust jacket "Shiva is one of the great minds on our planet." This notwithstanding, just a week later I was able to buy a new copy on Amazon for $3.25, one of 52 available from third party sellers. It seems that a wave of promotional copies was quickly discarded by its recipients. When Ayyadurai began to bill himself as the inventor of email, some speculated that this was to promote his forthcoming book and boost demand for his consulting services. The Email Revolution is presented as a self-help guide for corporate leaders keen to use electronic mail more effectively. About a dozen short chapters tell the story of how EchoMail helped corporations handle large volumes of email with ease. Several more chapters provide "ten commandments" and "50 tips" on email. So far, so generic. Yet The Email Revolution is perhaps the strangest book I've received in the mail since my graduate student days, when someone flooded my department with unrequested copies of <http://www.amazon.com/Psychiatrists-Behind-Hitler-Thomas-Roder/dp/096489091 7> Psychiatrists-- The Men Behind Hitler: The Architects of Horror. This is because of its hybrid character - Ayyadurai's upbeat corporate case studies are intertwined with a mass of material intended to overwhelm critics of his historical claims, or at least create sufficient doubt to maintain a "controversy." Thus the executive who picks up the The Email Revolution hoping to learn more about electronic mail as a business tool might be taken aback by the tone of the book's foreword. Leslie P. Michelson, Ayyadurai's former boss, presents him as the victim of a "cabal of insiders" with close ties to BBN, decrying a "wave of unwarranted, bigoted, and highly coordinated attacks," and trumpeting the heroic discovery of "an important document in an old dusty microfiche in the bowels of MIT's library system" to "demonstrate how this cabal was purposefully not revealing historical facts." There follows a statement by Noam Chomsky furthering the conspiracy theme, and a "personal note" by Ayyadurai presenting his copyright registration form as evidence of the "first US Copyright for creating 'email.' After the personal note is the introduction, which includes mention of his scheme to save the post office by retraining its workers to sort electronic messages, and makes a detour into explaining his firing from CSIR in India (where he was "under threat of physical violence, as well as incarceration" for revealing its "rampant corruption"). Ayyadurai still isn't ready to get to the business-friendly lessons. Chapter one explains what electronic mail is. You might expect someone who just brought a book on this subject to know that already, but explaining it anyway gives Ayyadurai a chance to present his idiosyncratic new definition of "email as the full-scale electronic emulation of the interoffice, interorganizational paper-based mail system." Chapter two takes us back to his early system and its features, reiterating his argument that no earlier system deserves to be called "email" and presenting to his audience second time the quote from Dave Crocker discovered in the bowels of MIT. He digs deeper into his complex definition, pausing occasionally to dismiss the work of electronic mail pioneers such as Tom Van Vleck. Apparently still unaware that his own system did not use a relational database management system Ayyadurai writes that "without a relational database, email would not have been possible." Only after all this is Ayyadurai ready to starts talking about the wonderful things he has done to help corporations automatically process their electronic mail. Ten upbeat pages follow, but by the end of the chapter Ayyadurai's fondness for presenting himself as a underdog fighting conspiracies of the powerful has resurfaced. He blames the post-2003 eclipse of his company EchoMail on the alliance of Siebel Systems, with "corrupt" analysts at Forrester Research and other firms in a "conscious and willful attempt to confuse the market." It's hard to imagine that many executives would still be reading at this point, but if they made it to the back of the book they would discover that it ends with appendices A through F, each of which reproduces material from Ayyadurai's website related to his historical claims For example, Appendix A is his "History of Email and Growth of EMAIL Accounts" infographic. Appendix G is the lengthy "Misuse of the Term 'Email' and False Claims About Email." Ayyadurai ends The Email Revolution with a list of the "blood brothers and sisters" who have "stood strong against the 'priesthood' or academia, 'scholars,' and the so-called 'computer historians'." Little wonder that the book seems to have made little impression on the world thus far, and that the only editorial review I did come across, a quick capsule writeup <http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-62153-263-7> from Publishers Weekly, concluded "Cynics may find this book to be a mixture of the dubious and the obvious." The historical material in the The Email Revolution, as it is almost all taken with little or no revision from Ayyadurai's website and so requires little new analysis. In particular I did not notice any new evidence to support his claims to have had an operational system in 1978 or to have used the word "email" prior to 1979. Ayyadurai's Treatment of "Email" post-1981 Ayyadurai has recently been using a rather tortuous definition to disqualify all of the many electronic mail systems produced prior to 1980 from consideration as "email" and thus keep alive his claim to have invented it. In contrast, his timelines and infographics have acknowledged a variety of post-1982 systems as being "email" without applying a similarly restrictive definition. In assembling the book he thus faced a particular challenge in bridging the gap from his rather personal version of 1978-1981, in which he is the world's leading (and perhaps only) electronic mail developer, to his more conventional view of the mid-1980s in which he admits the existence and widespread use of many unrelated systems. I was curious to see how the navigated this tricky narrative transition. In the event I was disappointed. The Email Revolution does not even try to demonstrate that his early "EMAIL" program had any influence on any email system produced or used in the world beyond the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. After describing his science fair submission in 1981 Ayyadurai jumps straight to 1993 and his efforts to build an automated tool to analyze incoming internet email. This jump causes further logical problems for his case. The early chapters, and Appendix G, breezily dismisses Internet-style decentralized mail systems, based on open standards for the exchange of messages, as mere "electronic text messages" lacking many necessary features to qualify as email. Between the end of chapter 2 (in 1981) and the start of chapter 3 (in 1993) systems of this kind suddenly become "email" despite still lacking the centralized relational databases and various other elements he proposes as essential elements of any true email system. In 1993, he tells us, the White House was receiving 5,000 emails a day and AT&T was handling Internet emails sent when customers entered information on pages on its new websites. The SMTP based systems used to transmit Internet email were the direct descendants of the ARPANET email systems of the 1970s he previously dismissed. They did not have return receipts, centralized system-wide address books, "registered memos," integrated relational database management systems, or the other architectural features he had, a few pages earlier, used to distinguish true "emails" from mere "text messages." This is not a coincidence. Electronic mail systems based on a unified message database, like his early "EMAIL" system, sometimes worked well in corporate environments where hardware and software could be standardized on an internal network but never successfully challenged the Internet's decentralized, standards-based approach as the basis for communication between organizations. Ayyadurai's timelines and graphics, reproduced in this book, only deepen this problem. Appendix A, his flagship infographic, includes the 1988 Macintosh Internet email client Eudora as "email." Xerox's PARC's 1979 Laurel did basically the same job in a very similar way, but is dismissed as a mere "user interface, and not the system of interlocked parts to emulate the entire interoffice paper mail system," because it depended on a server to hold undelivered mail. (As I noted in my previous analysis, the descriptions of Laurel quoted by Ayyadurai unambiguously contradict his claim that it was a front-end for PARC's command line mail reader rather than a replacement). Internal Inconsistences and Changing Claims There are some other conspicuous inconsistencies. The graph on page 25 suggests that around 10,000 email messages were sent in 1978. Endnote 3 cites a Huffington Post appearance of Ayyadurai's 2011 infographic as the source, which doesn't help much. 10,000 is, however, rather a high figure to start at and the line barely climbs over the next year. Thus if the graph is based on an actual data set it appears to have been truncated to avoid the embarrassing suggestion that email existed before 1978. On the other hand, the infographic on page 170 claims that there were zero users of email in 1978. Where did those 10,000 messages come from? Who read them? In 1979, according to the infographic, there were just 2 users of email. The big jump, it suggests, comes between 1982 and 1983 when the population of email users explodes from 1,000 to 100,000. No explanation is given for this hundred-fold growth. I looked again at Ayyadurai's website again search of something that might explain the mystery. I then noticed that the online version of the infographic <http://www.inventorofemail.com/history_of_email.asp> has recently been modified. Claim Old Infographic (in book and promoted on web since 2011 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/30/email-turns-29-infographi_n_941699 .html> ) New Infographic (on web <http://www.inventorofemail.com/history_of_email.asp#Infographic> as of September 20 2013) Number of email users in 1978 0 2 Number of email users in 1979 2 7 Text for "1978: The Challenge" High School student, (V.A.) Shiva Ayyadurai is asked by Les Michelson if he would like to create an electronic mail system for emulating inter- and intra-office mail across multiple offices and locations of the UMNDJ campus. (V.A.) Shiva Ayyadurai is asked by Les Michelson to create the full-scale electronic version of the interoffice paper mail system in use at UMNDJ. Shiva creates the first prototype. He calls it "Email." Text for "1979" Memos to Electronic Mail. The attributes of a memo, To:, From:, Cc:, Bcc:, Subject:, Body:, Attachment and its delivery process, Inbox, Outbox, Folders, Sorting, Security, etc. are converted into an electronic system. "Email System at UMNDJ: Email provides UMDNJ users Inbox, Outbox, Folders, the Memo (To, From, Subject, Date, Cc, Bcc) Attachements, etc., and processes such as Compose, Forward, Sort, and others with easy-to-use interface." Text for "1980" Inventing EMAIL. The first version of the electronic system is designed and deployed for use at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ). The system is called EMAIL. Using Email: Email use grows at UMDNJ. More users, secretaries and doctors, across departments, offices and groups are added on to the email system. The two infographics differ on vital points. The original infographic, produced early in Ayyadurai's campaign to brand himself "the inventor of email," puts the first operational version of the system in 1980. The new one, perhaps in response to evidence that both electronic mail systems and the term "e-mail" were both in use before 1980, pushes this back to 1978. I wonder how he might justify this change. Errors per Square Inch Ayyadurai is remarkably sloppy in discussing historical facts even when he has no plausible interest in misrepresenting them. The Email Revolution is issued by Allworth, which is apparently an obscure trade press rather than a self-publishing service. It does not, however, show much evidence of having been edited or checked by professionals. I do not remember ever seeing a commercially published book with such a remarkable density of errors, even for facts easily verified from Wikipedia. (Talking of Wikipedia, Google does reveal that shortly before its publication references to the book were added to a dozen separate pages by a single user <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arttechlaw> ). As an illustration, consider the following short passage on page 43. Ayyadurai generously acknowledges that "the design and development of email relies on several earlier developments in technology." All six of the bullet points following that statement are wrong in one way or another, and only three of them relate to technologies actually incorporated in Ayyadurai's system. * The development of FORTRAN in 1954 by John Backus at IBM. [That date for FORTRAN is rather misleading. A draft specification was drawn up in 1954, but the first implementation was not ready for users until 1957]. * The development of ASCII naming standard in 1962 by Bob Bremer. [Ayyadurai mischaracterizes ASCII as a "naming standard" and gets Bob Bemer's name wrong] * The invention of database technology in 1969 by Charles Bachman. [IDS, developed by Charles W. Bachman, was running by 1963 at the latest <http://wp.sigmod.org/?p=688> so that is another wrong date]. * The creation of TCP in 1973 by Vinton Cerf, Robert Kahn. [TCP was first described in a 1974 paper, but as Ayyadurai's system used no Internet/ARPANET technologies the bullet is misleading anyway]. * The development of Ethernet in 1973 by Bob Mercalfe. [Right date, but wrong name - it's Bob Metcalfe (and others at PARC). Also I would be shocked if Ayyadurai was using Ethernet on a HP/1000 in 1978. Metcalfe's firm 3Com, which spread Ethernet outside Xerox, was only founded in 1979]. * The development of TCP/IP by Danny Cohen, David Reed, and John Shoch. [Ayyadurai doesn't even attempt to date this one, but as Kahn and Cerf won the ACM Turing Award <http://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/cerf_1083211.cfm> for "pioneering work on internetworking, including the design and implement of the Internet's basic communications protocols, TCP/IP" it's safe to say that he has missed the two most important names.Though this is a trickier question as the list presents TCP and TCP/IP as two separate "developments"]. V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai's citation practices are as eccentric as his historical claims. Ayydurai quotes from this very web page at various points, occasionally even attaching a reference. Yet these somehow fail to include the page URL, page title, or my name. I wonder how Ayyadurai got those four degrees from MIT without learning how to properly cite a source when quoting it? Postscript 1: A month after I drafted the above The Email Revolution: Unleashing the Power to Connect continues to languish in obscurity and the cost of a copy on Amazon has dropped further (37 new copies from $2.61). However Ayyadurai is experiencing a new and unexpected wave of publicity as the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EchoMailhttp:/www.newser.com/story/176051/fran -dreschers-new-boytoy-the-inventor-of-email.html> "boytoy" or <http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/fran-drescher-steps-out-with- new-boyfriend-shiva-ayyadurai-email-inventor-of-email-picture-20131610> "email male" lover of sitcom actress Fran Drescher, best known for her starting role on "The Nanny." Postscript 2: Returning six months later in March 2014, I notice that the price of the book has dropped to $0.14 on Amazon. Somebody appears to be doing a spot of guerilla marketing for the book. Five glowing user reviews have appeared on Amazon, most of them by users with cryptic names and no other reviews. Four of these appeared between December 20 and December 31. There are also six goodreads.com reviews <http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17592645-the-email-revolution> , four of these are five star reviews posted between Feb 14 and Feb 18 by first-time reviewers. Ayyadurai continues to receive some rather credulous profiles in the Indian press from a "book tour" but the book otherwise seems to be languishing in obscurity.

1 0

Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Resources re: history of menus in computing?
by William McMillan 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

Hello, Laine. Menus were central to the UI of UCSD Pascal, Ken Bowles's project in the 1970s. Bowles talked with Steve Jobs int he early days (and later, Gates) and some of the students who worked on UCSD Pascal went to Apple and influenced the development of the Lisa etc. Apple Pascal (an OS as well as a programming environment) for the Apple II was UCSD Pascal. There are a lot of good web resources on UCSD Pascal, and I had a magazine article on its history in IEEE Spectrum. This was certainly an early and influential deployment of a menu-driven UI. Games were developed in UCSD Pascal, but I don't know if they were notable at all. - Bill - Hide quoted text - On 3/15/14, Laine Nooney <laine.nooney(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently pulling together a short essay for a game history lexicon on > the emergence of the menu in games. This topic is running me a bit in > circles--menus seem to be one of those components that are so "obvious," or > taken for granted in the game dev realm, that they aren't deeply, > explicitly talked about. > > I'm wondering what the respective literature around "menus" might be in the > history of computing. Are there obvious touchstones or definitive > transitions to be aware of (especially beyond the visible > PARC/Apple/Windows GUI histories)? > > And to be clear, I'm trying to keep this distinct from UI issues (insofar > as that's possible!) > > Any leads, food for thought, or general chatter would be much appreciated! > > Best, > > Laine Nooney > Department of Cultural Analysis and Theory > Stony Brook University > > Editorial Assistant to the Journal of Visual Culture > vcu.sagepub.com > > www.lainenooney.com >

6 6

FW: No large attachments allowed on the list (sorry Paul)
by Thomas Haigh 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

[Atsushi has fallen victim to the DNS troll that sometimes eats messages intended for the list. Tom] Hi Paul, But let me also relay my thanks for digging up and sharing this document! I do think it's great for those in the community to be aware of key documents, as well as the higher order info that filters through about how key documents from this era are becoming accessible via declassification. I do support the SIG policy about circulating links vs. the documents themselves. Makes sense to me! Kudos to everyone involved!! - Atsushi (**Please excuse me if this message seems brief. Especially during my sabbatical year, I am trying to limit my replies to five (5) lines or less. I'm sure you'll appreciate this in turn!**) _________________________________________________________ Atsushi Akera Associate Professor, Department of Science and Technology Studies Rensselaer Polytechnic institute 110 8th Street Troy, NY 12180 USA cel: 518.300.0613/fx:518.276-2659/e:akeraa@rpi.edu /w: http://www.rpi.edu/~akeraa From: members-bounces(a)sigcis.org [mailto:members-bounces@sigcis.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Haigh Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:01 PM To: 'Paul N. Edwards'; 'sigcis' Cc: 'Willard McCarty' Subject: [SIGCIS-Members] No large attachments allowed on the list (sorry Paul) Hello Paul and SIGCIS members, Our list is set with a maximum message size of 200KB, and attachments are in general frowned upon. This is for two reasons. First, we have over 300 members and not all of them are interested enough in any specific topic to force large attachments into their mailboxes, which can be a problem when people are on slower links or receiving messages wirelessly with limited data plans. Second, attachments do not archive or work for digest mode subscribers. The document does sound very interesting, and I urge Paul to upload it somewhere like Dropbox. The URL for the download can then be shared to all members, and will work correctly in the archive and digest versions of the list. Full list policies at http://www.sigcis.org/node/14. Best wishes, Tom From: members-bounces(a)sigcis.org [mailto:members-bounces@sigcis.org] On Behalf Of Paul N. Edwards Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 7:23 AM To: sigcis Cc: Willard McCarty Subject: [SIGCIS-Members] ADSEC Final Report, 1950 - declassified, and attached here SIGCISers and SIGCISters - Courtesy of Prof. Willard McCarty, who dug this out with a FOIA request and some help from an archivist and others at Lincoln Labs, here is the 1950 final report of the Air Defense Systems Engineering Committee (ADSEC) - classified until now. Many of you will know that this committee, aka the Valley Committee (for its leader, MIT prof George Valley), played a major role in initiating the SAGE air defense system of the 1950s. It's a fascinating read for the organism/machine metaphors, the cybernetic thinking, and the view of what was seen as possible (and not possible). To me, one of the most interesting thing about it is the awareness that converting analog signals into digital form was even more of a stumbling block than computing itself, which is seen as a relatively trivial matter that would require mainly time to develop computers with enough capacity to track hundreds or thousands of airplanes at once. Best, Paul ___________________________ Paul N. Edwards Professor of <http://www.si.umich.edu/> Information and <http://www.lsa.umich.edu/history/> History, University of Michigan A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming <http://pne.people.si.umich.edu/vastmachine/index.html> (MIT Press, 2010) Terse replies are deliberate <http://five.sentenc.es/> (and better than nothing) University of Michigan School of Information <http://www.si.umich.edu/> 3439 North Quad 105 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1285 (734) 764-2617 (office) (206) 337-1523 (fax) pne.people.si.umich.edu

1 0

CHM's annual journal -- CORE -- released today!
by Dag Spicer 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

Hello SIGCIS Friends, I’m delighted to announce the release of our annual journal, CORE. It is available for free download here: http://www.computerhistory.org/core/ There are some excellent historical articles, by CHM Internet curator Marc Weber, on the Internet and the Web among others. Enjoy! Dag Senior Curator CHM

1 0

Link to ADSEC report on a fileserver
by Paul N. Edwards 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

OK, Atsushi has brought the hammer down and you’ll have to retrieve the 1950 ADSEC report at this link. I won’t remove it anytime soon so feel free to share the link widely. :-) Sorry for the confusion! Best, Paul ___________________________ Paul N. Edwards Professor of Information and History, University of Michigan A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2010) Terse replies are deliberate (and better than nothing) University of Michigan School of Information 3439 North Quad 105 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1285 (734) 764-2617 (office) (206) 337-1523 (fax) pne.people.si.umich.edu

2 2