- Members - lists.sigcis.org

FW: News - The 2014 Tony Sale Award for Computer Conservation
by Martin Campbell-Kelly 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

NEWS RELEASE The 2014 Tony Sale Award for Computer Conservation - entries invited (pictures of the award, first award winner and ceremony available on request.) 14 January 2014 Entries are invited for the second Tony Sale Award for Computer Conservation 2014. The award is to recognise achievements in computer conservation or restoration, and is open to any individual or group anywhere in the world. Managed by the Computer Conservation Society and sponsored by Google UK, the award was established in memory of computer conservation pioneer Tony Sale, who rebuilt Colossus, the world's first electronic computer, and co-founded the Computer Conservation Society. The closing date for entries is 31 July 2014. Presentation of a £1000 cash prize and a trophy will be made at a ceremony in BCS Headquarters in London on 6 November 2014 The inaugural award was won by Dr David Link of Germany for his computer art installation Loveletters, a reconstruction of a 1951 computer with software that generates text to express and arouse emotions. Loveletters' fusion of art, engineering and history celebrates one of the first artistic applications of the computer and has attracted great interest in the media and from culturally-diverse audiences across the globe. Professor Martin Campbell-Kelly, computer historian and chairman of the Judging Panel, explained the purpose of the award: "Computer history may be relatively short, but progress has been incredibly fast and it is vital that this history is not lost. We can gain important insights and perspective by understanding the context and the challenges faced by computing pioneers over the past decades." Projects, which may cover hardware and/or software and represent any period in computing history, should have been completed in the past 5 years. Shortlisted entries for the inaugural award included a restoration of Digital Equipment Corporation's (DEC) first computer and a reconstruction and simulation of Konrad Zuses Z3 Computer. The main judging criteria are: · Originality: To what extent does the project demonstrate a novel approach to conservation or reconstruction? · Completeness: Has the project achieved the initial goals set? · Ingenuity: What new techniques or processes were developed during the project? · Impact: What contribution has the work made to increasing the understanding of the history of computing? · Outreach: Is the result of the work visible to experts in the field and/or to the general public? · Publicity: To what extent has the work already been publicised or written up? A short entry form is available as a Download on the Tony Sale Award website: <http://www.sale-award.org/> www.sale-award.org/ Completed entries should be sent to Mrs Peta Walmisley, Administrator of the Award <mailto:peta@pwcepis.demon.co.uk> peta(a)pwcepis.demon.co.uk The Computer Conservation Society is a joint venture between BCS, the Chartered Institute for IT; the Science Museum; and the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester. Notes To Editors About Tony Sale Tony Sale, in whose honour the computer conservation award has been established, is perhaps best known for leading the team that rebuilt Colossus, the world's first electronic computer. He was also a key figure in starting the campaign to save Bletchley Park in the early 1990s, he co-founded The National Museum of Computing and jointly established the Computer Conservation Society. Media Enquiries Stephen Fleming for the Computer Conservation Society Palam Communications t 01635 299116 e <mailto:sfleming@palam.co.uk> sfleming(a)palam.co.uk

1 0

CFP International Committee for the History of Technology (ICOHTEC), 29 July–2 August 2014 in Brasov, Rumania
by Thomas J. Misa 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

A Dutch colleague forwards this CFP . . . ---Tom Misa ------------------------------------------------------------------ Computers and the ‘second industrial revolution’ 1945-1970 For the meeting of the International Committee for the History of Technology (ICOHTEC), 29 July – 2 August 2014 in Brasov, Rumania, I would like to set up a panel to compare the ways in which, during the nineteen fifties and sixties, electronic computers were believed to change society in different countries. The panel explores an aspect of the conference’s general theme, ‘Technology in times of transition’. Several prominent intellectuals in the nineteen fifties, such as C.P. Snow and Norbert Wiener, thought that electronic computing represented the core of a ‘second industrial revolution’, which would cause a social transition more profound than that created by the first one. Since computers were introduced in many countries for similar purposes, one might expect similar debates everywhere. On the other hand, different economic and political conditions as well as different cultural traditions may account for differences in reactions to, and expectations of the new technology. The panel will explore such convergences and divergences by means of a number of national case studies. If you would like to participate, please submit your proposal to me at <vanlente(a)eshcc.eur.nl> before February 1, so that I can submit a session on February 3, which is the final deadline. Your proposal of 250-300 words should include your research question, sources and (preliminary) results. Please add your cv. Dick van Lente Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam <http://www.eshcc.eur.nl/english/personal/vanlente/> ======================================================

1 0

Re: [SIGCIS-Members] My column on Turing and the Invention of the Computer
by Paul Fishwick 18 Jan '14

18 Jan '14

Paul, Tom, and Colleagues [apologies to Marie and Tom for flooding their inboxes due to a problem I was having in my email subscription] In my lab, we explore methods of computation describable by synthetic (e.g. game-based sandbox environments such as Portal, Minecraft, etc) and tangible (e.g., physical models of computing) methods. With this strategy, the history of analog computing as well as the history of technology more generally, contain valuable cues toward the principles of computer science (the properties of memory, sequence, conditional branching and so forth). Are there others on this list with an analog computing interest, or is there another list, where analog methods are discussed, perhaps for their pedagogical advantage? In a possible departure from the norm, but consistent with an analog computing emphasis, I would claim that “the first human-made computers” were tally sticks. With the birth of number, came the method of computing. Within this particular technology, we find the basics: randomly addressable memory, ability to read and write, control, and arithmetic in its raw form---counting). On a separate personal topic, but related tangentially to this thread, in grad school at Penn, I was informed that my desk was in the vicinity of the old ENIAC work area. Indeed, my desk was definitely World War II vintage—warped, chipped and tiny. My interests were (and are) in graphics and computer simulation and for some reason I was blissfully unaware of the history of the ENIAC. I have been attempting to resurrect this interest starting with one simulator that I found on line. If others exist, please let me know where I might find them. -paul Paul Fishwick, PhD Chair, ACM SIGSIM Distinguished Chair of Arts & Technology and Professor of Computer Science Director, Creative Automata Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas Arts & Technology 800 West Campbell Road, AT10 Richardson, TX 75080-3021 Home: utdallas.edu/atec/fishwick Blog: creative-automata.com

1 0

Re: [SIGCIS-Members] My column on Turing and the Invention of the Computer
by Len Shustek 18 Jan '14

18 Jan '14

At 12:47 PM 1/17/2014, Thomas Haigh wrote: > > ...You may be interested in my newly published Communications of > the ACM Column "Actually, Turing Did Not Invent the Computer." > > ... I think also that the public really has room in its > collective memory for just one famous person per technology, > usually its inventor. ... There is indeed a public craving for lone heroic inventors. As an amateur historian I enjoy giving a talk whose title will make the professional historians here cringe: "Who Invented The Computer, and Why Don't You Know?". (The audience is often senior citizens. This is sometimes called the "rubber chicken circuit"; see wiki/Rubber_chicken.) You will be relieved to know that I don't answer the question. I talk about Babbage, Zuse, Turing, Atanasoff/Berry, Aiken, Eckert/Mauchly, William/Kilburn, Von Neumann, and Wilkes. All this in 50 minutes! I do confess to the audience that if I were subjected to torture and required to answer the question, I would unapologetically name Babbage as the first inventor of a computer that was never built. An excellent article, Tom, and a fun read. -- Len Dr. Leonard Shustek Chairman, Computer History Museum www.computerhistory.org

3 2

Profile of Ian Williamson, British microcomputer pioneer
by Tony Smith 18 Jan '14

18 Jan '14

Any members with an interest in the 1970s British early microcomputer scene may wish to take a look at my interview with and profile of Ian Williamson, a (then) Cambridge Consultants electronics engineer who devised Sir Clive Sinclair's first computer product, for Science of Cambridge, the company the eventually became Sinclair Research: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/16/archaeologic_ian_williamson/ Cheers, Tony -- Tony Smith Features Editor The Register http://www.theregister.co.uk Phone: +44 (0)203 189 4611 Mobile: +44 (0)7793 440 395 Mail: The Register, First Floor, The Lightwell, 12-16 Laystall Street , London, EC1R 4PF, UK ABCe independent audit Nov 2012 for The Register: 43.66m page impressions, 7.33m unique readers.

1 0

Were any early computers completed on schedule?
by Thomas Haigh 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

Hello, For my ongoing project on ENIAC I've written a sentence SEAC, another early computer, that includes the words "..although finished well behind schedule, like all early computers.". It's been suggested to me that several Colossus computers were in fact finished on schedule. Does anyone know if this is true? Also, are there any other examples of early digital computers of the 1940s or earlier reaching reliable operation more or less on the schedule promised to the people funding them? Delays to ENIAC, EDVAC, the IAS computer, ACE, Univac, the Manchester Mark 1, the Harvard Mark 1, and of course Babbage's Difference Engine are well documented. I can always change "all" to "most" but this is now making me curious. Best wishes, Tom

6 7

FW: Were any early computers completed on schedule?
by Thomas Haigh 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

[Another contribution to this discussion] -----Original Message----- From: Roger Neil Barton [mailto:neil.barton@uclmail.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:47 AM To: Ceruzzi, Paul; 'Brian Randell'; thaigh(a)computer.org Cc: members(a)sigcis.org Subject: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Were any early computers completed on schedule? Tom, Just to echo Paul's comment. I joined ICL mainframe manufacturing division in West Gorton, Manchester as Financial Controller (FC) in the mid 70s. As you know ICL was a combination of Ferranti, ICT, and English Electric. West Gorton and its satellite Dukinfield were in all but name Ferranti, responsible for design and manufacture with a continuing Ferranti corporate culture. All the FCs throughout manufacturing were replaced at the same time and we all recruited from the automobile industry which operated with annual model changes. More particularly the auto industry operated with engineering changes that were documented right through the company and they wanted people used to these procedures. Finance was a very powerful function but within my team we had graduate engineers, chemists, physicists, and mathematicians and so were not really bean counters. What I found when I joined was that every machine on the shop floor was different with design engineers feeling free to come downstairs and give instructions to the shop floor personnel even retrospectively amend the design spec, but not because the customer had wanted something different. As far as the design engineers were concerned this gave the customer the benefit of their latest thinking. It had never occurred to them that these changes had cost (and therefore profit) implications. As I knew that was why I and my colleagues had been recruited I implemented a system of formal engineering changes that could be implemented at regular intervals. The 2900 range was the first range where the product could be said to be 'finished' before it began production. kind regards neil PS I don't think my submissions are accepted by sigcis so perhaps you would be kind enough to post it for me. Dr Roger Neil Barton -----Original Message----- From: Ceruzzi, Paul Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:01 PM To: 'Brian Randell' ; thaigh(a)computer.org Cc: <members(a)sigcis.org> Subject: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Were any early computers completed on schedule? Thanks, Brian. In America we would say that the Colossus is the Rodney Dangerfield of computers -- it does not get the respect it deserves. One issue that I have is that for most early computers (and complex technology in general), there was no such thing as being "finished" on a certain date. Perhaps with the exception of the Colossus, they all eased themselves into operation. So it is not clear when to assign a date of completion, as much as people want to do that. Paul E. Ceruzzi Chair, Division of Space History National Air & Space Museum MRC 311; PO Box 37012 Washington, DC 20013-7012 202-633-2414 <http://www.nasm.si.edu/staffDetail.cfm?staffID=24> -----Original Message----- From: members-bounces(a)sigcis.org [mailto:members-bounces@sigcis.org] On Behalf Of Brian Randell Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:06 AM To: thaigh(a)computer.org Cc: <members(a)sigcis.org> Subject: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Were any early computers completed on schedule? Hi Tom: The first Colossus was built on the initiative of Tommy Flowers at the Post Office Research Station, and was completed in eleven months, becoming operational there in December 1943, before being moved to Bletchley Park where it was placed into service in early 1944. Soon after this he and his team were "asked" to make a dozen further machines, which were wanted by June 1944! This was plainly impossible, but Flowers undertook to try to get the first production, or Mark 2, Colossus ready by that date, and further ones ready at about one month intervals. (The Mark 2 Colossus machines involved a major redesign and through the use of parallelism were five times faster than the initial machine.) To quote my paper, at the 1976 Los Alamos conference on the History of Computing on Colossus: "By 31 May [the first Mark 2 Colossus] was nearly complete. Flowers, Broadhurst, Chandler, Coombs and Saville were all at Bletchley Park, but they could not get the machine to work. Eventually, in the early hours of 1 June, the others went home to get some sleep, leaving Chandler to work on, since the trouble was in the part he had redesigned. In his words, "The whole system was in a state of violent parasitic oscillation at a frequency outside the range of our oscilloscopes [and then] by way of diversion, at about 3.00 a.m. a nearby radiator started leaking, sending a pool of warm water towards the equipment!". He eventually found a means of curing the problem and at nearly 4.00 a.m. left Norman Thurlow, one of the maintenance engineers, to finish the required rewiring. The others others arrived back at 8.30 a.m. to find that the machine was working. The deadline had been beaten - and it was just five days to D-day, 6 June 1944!" [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/publicat ions/books/papers/133.pdf&k=diZKtJPqj4jWksRIF4bjkw%3D%3D%0A&r=iEx95BOSDrL1Sb ShZgBAew%3D%3D%0A&m=tfHMe3JuD9T32JpBQY0J1zbPYDidGqKq6g8doPfgbqs%3D%0A&s=50ad 56df86049bc505ab2fa438adf88a8bbc98d2fa7a830b33f8a8d0f4d832a3] By the end of the war, at least ten Colossi were operational at Bletchley Park. So the answer to your question about Colossus is an emphatic "yes". Cheers Brian On 13 Jan 2014, at 17:17, Thomas Haigh <thaigh(a)computer.org> wrote: > Hello, > > For my ongoing project on ENIAC I've written a sentence SEAC, another > early computer, that includes the words "..although finished well > behind schedule, like all early computers.". > > It's been suggested to me that several Colossus computers were in fact > finished on schedule. Does anyone know if this is true? > > Also, are there any other examples of early digital computers of the > 1940s or earlier reaching reliable operation more or less on the > schedule promised to the people funding them? Delays to ENIAC, EDVAC, > the IAS computer, ACE, Univac, the Manchester Mark 1, the Harvard > Mark 1, and of course Babbage's Difference Engine are well documented. > > I can always change "all" to "most" but this is now making me curious. > > Best wishes, > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > This email is relayed from members(a)sigcis.org, the email discussion > list of SHOT SIGCIS. The list archives are at > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://sigcis.org/pipermail > /members/&k=diZKtJPqj4jWksRIF4bjkw%3D%3D%0A&r=iEx95BOSDrL1SbShZgBAew%3 > D%3D%0A&m=tfHMe3JuD9T32JpBQY0J1zbPYDidGqKq6g8doPfgbqs%3D%0A&s=f690d2ac > f540987161177494b600f31f714a1e9c56325a0d9a5bff580c659217 > and you can change your subscription options > athttp://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU EMAIL = Brian.Randell(a)ncl.ac.uk PHONE = +44 191 222 7923 URL = https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/br ian.randell&k=diZKtJPqj4jWksRIF4bjkw%3D%3D%0A&r=iEx95BOSDrL1SbShZgBAew%3D%3D %0A&m=tfHMe3JuD9T32JpBQY0J1zbPYDidGqKq6g8doPfgbqs%3D%0A&s=5e9d6121e7337ec2f3 c2b2d664f11bade94a477a2e4bdb77c3179bf0126e010e _______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members(a)sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. The list archives are at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://sigcis.org/pipermail/membe rs/&k=diZKtJPqj4jWksRIF4bjkw%3D%3D%0A&r=iEx95BOSDrL1SbShZgBAew%3D%3D%0A&m=tf HMe3JuD9T32JpBQY0J1zbPYDidGqKq6g8doPfgbqs%3D%0A&s=f690d2acf540987161177494b6 00f31f714a1e9c56325a0d9a5bff580c659217 and you can change your subscription options at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinf o/members&k=diZKtJPqj4jWksRIF4bjkw%3D%3D%0A&r=iEx95BOSDrL1SbShZgBAew%3D%3D%0 A&m=tfHMe3JuD9T32JpBQY0J1zbPYDidGqKq6g8doPfgbqs%3D%0A&s=59057792990f3e3ec392 911c37beb4c32e654ea83171359a5173d3f27030b4b1 _______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members(a)sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members

1 0

The Sinclair QL - aka Quantum Leap - is 30 years old
by Tony Smith 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

Any members with an interest in early 1980s microcomputers may want to take a look at my in-depth history of the Sinclair QL, aka the ZX83. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/12/archaeologic_sinclair_ql/ Tony Smith Features Editor The Register http://www.theregister.co.uk Phone: +44 (0)203 189 4611 Mobile: +44 (0)7793 440 395 Mail: The Register, First Floor, The Lightwell, 12-16 Laystall Street , London, EC1R 4PF, UK ABCe independent audit Nov 2012 for The Register: 7.33m unique readers, 43.66m page impressions Preliminary audit Nov 2013: 9.47m unique readers, 44.07m page impressions

1 0

New blog post on Navajo women and IC technology
by Dag Spicer 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Dear SIGCIS Friends, We have a great blog post out today from Professor Lisa Nakamura of the University of Michigan. http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/indigenous-circuits/ Comments are encouraged! Best, Dag About Lisa Nakamura: Lisa Nakamura is Professor of Screen Arts and Cultures and American Cultures and Asian Pacific Island Studies at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She is the author of Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet (University of Minnesota Press: winner of the Asian American Studies Association 2010 book award in cultural studies), Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity and Identity on the Internet (Routledge, 2002) and co-editor of Race in Cyberspace (Routledge, 2000) and Race After the Internet (Routledge, 2011). Nakamura has written most recently on how reading platforms such as Goodreads press readers into performing identities as readers in networked forums in PMLA, January 2013. She is writing a new monograph on social inequality in digital media culture, entitled “Workers Without Bodies: Towards a Theory of Race and Digital Labor.” She serves on the editorial boards of the journal of visual culture, New Media and Society, Journal of Asian American Studies, Games and Culture, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, and Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture. -- Dag Spicer Senior Curator Computer History Museum 1401 N. Shoreline Blvd Mountain View, CA 94043 650.810.1035 direct 650.810.1055 fax Follow Us: CHM Blog I Facebook I Twitter I YouTube

1 0

CBI and ACM fellowship deadlines --> 15 January
by Thomas J. Misa 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Hi all, Just a reminder that there are several fellowship deadlines on **Wednesday** of this week. Hope that you are developing great projects, and can keep the funding streams healthy . . . and your research active! * CBI--Tomash fellowship <http://www.cbi.umn.edu/research/tfellowship.html>. Pre-doctoral fellowship in computer history. * CBI--Norberg travel grants <http://www.cbi.umn.edu/research/ntravelfund.html>. Travel grants to use research collections at CBI. * ACM History Committee research fellowships "up to four projects with awards of up to $4,000 each"<http://history.acm.org/public/public_documents/acm_history_fellowship_annou…>. Please make sure to specify your research project's connection to ACM history. * ACM archiving workshop <http://history.acm.org/public/public_documents/acm_hc_2014.php> to be held at CBI this May 21-22. Projects that are /creating/ archives related to ACM history (organization, conferences, journals, SIGs, notable people) are the focus here. Best, Tom

1 0