Fascinating edit war at the Wikipedia page on email
Hello everyone, The last few days seem to have seen a great deal of back and forth in edits and on the talk section of Wikipedia's page on email. Pro-Ayyadurai forces have jumped in to seize on the Huffington Post series as documentation to rewrite the text to give him a staring role. A cynic might speculate that the Wikipedia page is the real prize and the Huffington Post articles merely a means to an end. They have, thus far, been beaten back with heavy resistance by Wikipedia loyalists. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Email#Recent_published_research:_1978_Inve ntion_by_Shiva_Ayyadurai. It is interesting to see the social processes at work in shaping what for most will be the first and only destination in a search for an authoritative account of something. I did notice many references to Ayyadurai being edited over the past couple of years into other, less policed, Wikipedia pages. This included about a dozen references to his book being added to various pages before it was even published. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arttechlaw Ayyadurai himself saw the removal of previous references to him from various articles as some kind of conspiracy and documented the process as part of how "systems of power react when they feel threatened." http://www.inventorofemail.com/Removal-Of-References-On-Wikipedia-To-VA-Shiv a-Ayyadurai-As-Inventor.asp Tom
It brings to mind what I've thought over the years about some other forms of vandalism (and I'd argue that Ayyadurai is vandalizing the historical record): imagine if he put all of this energy into actually doing something original, instead of crying "conspiracy theory" to promote a "creative" account that has been roundly disproven. I wonder if he studied the anti-vaccine movement? -- Ian On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Thomas Haigh <thaigh@computer.org> wrote:
Hello everyone,
The last few days seem to have seen a great deal of back and forth in edits and on the talk section of Wikipedia’s page on email. Pro-Ayyadurai forces have jumped in to seize on the Huffington Post series as documentation to rewrite the text to give him a staring role. A cynic might speculate that the Wikipedia page is the real prize and the Huffington Post articles merely a means to an end. They have, thus far, been beaten back with heavy resistance by Wikipedia loyalists. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Email#Recent_published_research:_1978_Inve....
It is interesting to see the social processes at work in shaping what for most will be the first and only destination in a search for an authoritative account of something. I did notice many references to Ayyadurai being edited over the past couple of years into other, less policed, Wikipedia pages. This included about a dozen references to his book being added to various pages before it was even published. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arttechlaw
Ayyadurai himself saw the removal of previous references to him from various articles as some kind of conspiracy and documented the process as part of how “systems of power react when they feel threatened.” http://www.inventorofemail.com/Removal-Of-References-On-Wikipedia-To-VA-Shiv...
Tom
_______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members
-- Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS Ph.D. Candidate The Information School University of Washington Give a man a fire, and he will be warm for the night. Set him on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
participants (2)
-
Ian S. King -
Thomas Haigh