Dear list members, Paul Fishwick had a response to the riddle of computing's scientific nature; here's another shot at the same question: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781482217698 Fresh from press - still warm. But it's not a history book. It's not a philosophy book either. I don't know what kind of book it is, but it was fun to write. Matti Tedre Fishwick, Paul wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk<mailto:willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk>> wrote:
Dear all (from the sidelines),
I agree that the history and philosophy of computing belong in close proximity to each other, that both are rich and important fields -- and I'd like to see the usually far too utilitarian digital humanities (at the intersection of computing and the humanities) brought into the discussion. It's the intersecting that makes it valuable here. I particularly like Mike Mahoney's comment that the question "is computer science a science" is actually two questions: "what happens to computing if you call it a science?" and "what do you mean by 'science' if computing is one?”
This is one response to these two questions:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2601381.2601391
-p
Yours, WM
Paul Fishwick, PhD Chair, ACM SIGSIM Distinguished University Chair of Arts & Technology and Professor of Computer Science Director, Creative Automata Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas Arts & Technology 800 West Campbell Road, AT10 Richardson, TX 75080-3021 Home: utdallas.edu/atec/fishwick<http://utdallas.edu/atec/fishwick> Blog: creative-automata.com<http://creative-automata.com>
_______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members