Whoops, misread your email. I thought you were characterizing ENIAC as "Aberdeen [in semi-automatic operation] in a box". On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Bjorn Westergard <bjornw@gmail.com> wrote:
Eckert, in his "Punched Card Methods" definitely seems like he would have agreed with "Aberdeen in a Box" view.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Ceruzzi, Paul <CeruzziP@si.edu> wrote:
It is fascinating to see Tom and others finding new and interesting things to say about the ENIAC and its programmers, a topic that some of us thought was tapped out years ago. I’ve been asked to write a short piece about the ENIAC in context. I was reluctant to trot out the old cliché about how much power you have in a cell phone, etc. But I did come across this app for the iPhone, which puts the ENIAC in an interesting light:
http://www.winchester.com/learning-center/ballistics-calculator/Pages/ballis...
Maybe this is old news to many of you, but it was a surprise to me. A ballistics calculator that does what the ENIAC was originally built for. So it is not just an “ENIAC in a box”; it is “The Aberdeen Proving Ground in a box.” Recall that in addition to the ENIAC, Aberdeen also had IBM punched card equipment, including some custom-designed by Wallace Eckert (the IBM PSRC), a Bell Labs Model V relay computer, teams of human (mostly women) computers, and Lord knows what else. Who could have thought we’d come to this?
Paul
_______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members