Excuse me if I missed an earlier email but the British Computer Society has published criteria on curriculum content which it applies when accrediting courses. See www.bcs.org<http://www.bcs.org> Roger Johnson From: members-bounces@sigcis.org [mailto:members-bounces@sigcis.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Mounier Sent: 05 October 2012 16:43 To: Janet Abbate Cc: sigcis Subject: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Computer Science in Higher Education Hello Janet, In turn, I am very interested to know about your project. The ACM Curriculum '68, discussed in IFIP committees, contributed to shape computer science curricula in France and certainly in other countries. Regarding a session at next year's SHOT/ SIGCIS, in addition to Ulf Hashagen and Irina Nikiforova, you might contact these German authors: - Reuse, B. & Vollmar, R. (ed.) : Informatikforschung in Deutschland. Springer, 2008 - Pieper, C.: Hochschulinformatik in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR bis 1989/1990. Steiner, 2009 - Wolfgang Coy: "Was ist Informatik? Zur Entstehung des Faches an den deutschen Universitäten". In: Hellige, H.-D. (ed.): Geschichten der Informatik, Springer, 2004, 473-497. [a title which predated "Histories of Computing"!] There is also a growing scholarship in Italy, yet they are still much concerned with hardware development or business history. All the best, Pierre Le 5 oct. 12 à 15:52, Janet Abbate a écrit : Hello Pierre, I will be very interested to read your article. I am myself beginning a project on computer science in higher education, focusing initially on the ACM computer science Curriculum '68 and Curriculum '78 as efforts to define and standardize computer science in universities. Unfortunately I will not be at SHOT this year, but I would like to organize a session at next year's SHOT (either SIGCIS or the SHOT conference itself) on academic computer science. I will contact you in the spring after the call for papers comes out to ask if you might be interested in such a session. I believe there are several us working in this area (for example, Ulf Hashagen and Irina Nikiforova) and it would be useful to have a discussion of common themes--as well as culturally specific variants--in the development of university computer science. best regards, Janet Dr. Janet Abbate Associate Professor Science & Technology in Society Virginia Tech On Oct 5, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Pierre Mounier wrote: Dear Friends & Colleagues, This is just to inform SIGCIS members, particularly those working on Computer Science in Higher Education, of a paper about to appear : "Computer Science in French Universities: Early Entrants and Latecomers" http://www.infoculturejournal.org/current_issue/47.4 This paper stems from my book *, but goes further to define models of development in an international comparaison perspective. With cordial salutations, looking forward to meet some of you in Copenhagen, Pierre Mounier-Kuhn CNRS & Université Paris-Sorbonne * http://pups.paris-sorbonne.fr/pages/aff_livre.php?Id=838 http://www.koyre.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/CV-Mounier-Kuhn_1_.pdf Abstract - MOUNIER-KUHN Pierre, 2012, "Computer Science in French Universities: Early Entrants and Latecomers", Information & Culture: A Journal of History, vol. 47, n° 4. How do new disciplines develop in certain universities, not in others ? What factors shape the geography of science ? The history of computer science in French higher education suggests a model to describe this development and differenciation process. Computer science stemmed from local configurations associating a school of electrical engineering and a professor of numerical analysis. In the early 1950s, a few professors, who may be characterized as "science entrepreneurs", created three-fold structures, associating courses in applied mathematics and programming, a computing facility and a research laboratory. This initiated a cumulative development process, attracting students, researchers, contracts, funding and powerful machines, and opening the field to novel applications or theoretical investigations. In other universities, these configurations were not completed - typically, they were limited to an assistant and a small computer, so that computing remained confined to technical training. In the 1960s, the pioneers became the leaders of the new informatics field, hold power positions in learned societies and in science policy committees, and controlled the definition of computer science curricula. As the computing institutes they had created reached considerable size, they began to spin off their junior professors toward other universities, thus still increasing their « radiance ». These centers, like Grenoble, Nancy or Toulouse, remain major academic centers in the discipline today. _______________________________________________ This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org<mailto:members@sigcis.org>, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members

Dear colleagues, Since we are discussing computer science in higher education, I wanted to point to an opinion piece I just wrote for CACM, entitled "Computing as if Infrastructure Mattered." http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2012/10/155551-computing-as-if-infrastructure-... http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/blanchette/papers/caiim.pdf The piece focuses on computational thinking", an approach that suggests that computing concepts should be taught as fundamental literacy skills. I argue that it neglects, among other things, the historical dimension of the computing infrastructure. There are some interesting differences and parallels with Vint Cerf's piece in the same issue, "Where's the science in computer science?" http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2012/10/155530-where-is-the-science-in-compute... Best wishes, Jean-François

Dear Friends & Colleagues,

This is just to inform SIGCIS members, particularly those working on Computer Science in Higher Education, of a paper about to appear :

"Computer Science in French Universities: Early Entrants and Latecomers" http://www.infoculturejournal.org/current_issue/47.4

This paper stems from my book *, but goes further to define models of development in an international comparaison perspective.

With cordial salutations, looking forward to meet some of you in Copenhagen, Pierre Mounier-Kuhn

CNRS & Université Paris-Sorbonne * http://pups.paris-sorbonne.fr/pages/aff_livre.php?Id=838 http://www.koyre.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/CV-Mounier-Kuhn_1_.pdf

Abstract - MOUNIER-KUHN Pierre, 2012, "Computer Science in French Universities: Early Entrants and Latecomers", Information & Culture: A Journal of History, vol. 47, n° 4.

How do new disciplines develop in certain universities, not in others ? What factors shape the geography of science ? The history of computer science in French higher education suggests a model to describe this development and differenciation process.

Computer science stemmed from local configurations associating a school of electrical engineering and a professor of numerical analysis. In the early 1950s, a few professors, who may be characterized as “science entrepreneurs”, created three-fold structures, associating courses in applied mathematics and programming, a computing facility and a research laboratory. This initiated a cumulative development process, attracting students, researchers, contracts, funding and powerful machines, and opening the field to novel applications or theoretical investigations. In other universities, these configurations were not completed – typically, they were limited to an assistant and a small computer, so that computing remained confined to technical training.

In the 1960s, the pioneers became the leaders of the new informatics field, hold power positions in learned societies and in science policy committees, and controlled the definition of computer science curricula. As the computing institutes they had created reached considerable size, they began to spin off their junior professors toward other universities, thus still increasing their « radiance ». These centers, like Grenoble, Nancy or Toulouse, remain major academic centers in the discipline today.

-- Jean-François Blanchette, Associate Professeur Dept. of Information Studies, UCLA http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/blanchette Burdens of Proof: amzn.com/0262017512

Dear colleagues, I am looking for an article/book chapter that would cover the evolution of microprocessing families/platforms either since the beginning of the industry or from a more recent date --- looking at design features, technical strategies, market segmentation, industry alliances, things of that sort, individually or in combination. I have articles from the Intel Technology Magazine that describe their own particular strategies, but I am looking for something industry-wide. I also have various articles about the future of microprocessor design, e.g., http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1941487.1941507 but no historical overview. If anyone has any pointers, I'd be most grateful. Jean-François -- Jean-François Blanchette, Associate Professeur Dept. of Information Studies, UCLA http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/blanchette