The position of the exhibit was "Greater NYC", which certainly makes sense as a regionalist designation, and allowed the exhibit to extend its scope into spaces like Tennis 4 Two at Brookhaven National Lab in Long Island, Bell Labs in NJ (whose famed artistic-engineering collaborations were largely possible because of proximity to the collective creativity of NYC), and IBM itself in upstate.
For the sake of transparency in the record, I also consulted very briefly regarding the games component of the exhibit, but ultimately passed the curator off to my colleague Raiford Guins, who was better specialized in topics the exhibit wanted to focus on.Evan I would be very interested in some sort of panel discussion (rather than a series of presentations) about these issues, especially in collaboration with key exhibit decisionmakers. I'd like to find our common ground here. Perhaps it would be even more valuable to bring in people not yet included in the story--it was surprising to see no representation of NYC's 1990s "Silicon Alley" moment. Other topics drifting include Stacy Horn's ECHO, and the history of NYC's polytechnic schools, as well as programs like ITP @ NYU.thoughtfully,LaineOn Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:09 PM Kim Tracy <tracy@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:Bell Labs did start in 1925 in NYC on West Street as part of Western Electric and moved to Murray Hill, NJ in the early 1940s. A number of folks that I worked with started at the West Street location. So, some of the computing work was done there but much more after that in NJ.--Kim_______________________________________________On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Evan Koblentz <evan@snarc.net> wrote:Would also like to encourage others to go, perhaps most especially to
start a conversation about how we can imagine computer histories. I
attended yesterday with a colleague and left feeling dismayed--the
sticky fingers of IBM (a major donor for the exhibit) appeared to be all
over it (at one point I openly laughed at some wall text that described
Apple as a "plucky startup" but insisting IBM /really/ drove the tech
revolution). There are a few special, very sincere parts--the 1964
Worlds Fair dome, the focus on NYC's role in electronic art and music
(Cage, Bell Labs, etc) but otherwise reads like the history of computing
told through the history of IBM--which feels strange given that there's
no special effort to frame IBM as a /regionalist /company.
Would love to stoke a conversation, even off list, about other's
impressions...feel free to drop me an email.
I'm planning to go soon.
NYHS asked for my assistance several months ago. I provided a lot of feedback about NY computer history beyond Big Blue. They said I'd be credited as a consultant, so I am disappointed to hear that the exhibition is basically just an IBM gig.
I hope that didn't claim Bell Labs as a NY entity. Statue of Liberty is in * New Jersey * waters, the "New York" Giants and Jets both play in New Jersey, now Bell Labs? Note to myself .... go see the exhibit firsthand before getting judgmental. :)
In 1966 -- a decade * before * IBM started telling customers that real computers are made out of metal by east coast corporations, not plastic by west coast hippies -- Steven Grey began publishing the "Amateur Computer Society" newsletter from his home in Manhattan. This was before the Mother of All Demos, Xerox PARC, and the People's Computer Company.
Upon starting his newsletter, Gray contacted IBM to see about funding. IBM replied with a very nice letter saying no. The letter is signed by Thomas Watson Jr. -- there are copies online, but the original is at the (Wall, N.J.) InfoAge Science Center where I run the computer wing.
Tens years later, when Creative Computing, Byte, DDJ, etc. all emerged, and the photocopied ACS newsletter closed, IBM invited Gray to lecture about this "new" idea of microcomputing -- in the Thomas Watson Research Center.
I'm just saying. :)
_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org--Laine Nooney