Thanks all for the responses. 

I just remembered that I came across "critical infrastructure studies" in this excerpt from Alan Liu's book-in-progress tentatively titled "Against the Cultural Singularity: Digital Humanities & Critical Infrastructure Studies." http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/drafts-for-against-the-cultural-singularity/ 

He writes something to the effect that he's borrowing a "lightly anti-foundationalism" from critical infrastructure studies but I'm not sure yet who he's engaging with in terms of the latter and was curious about whether critical infrastructure studies had become an established branch from the main field or whether it's not well known or considered idiosyncratic. 

In terms of "critical," Liu quotes from Michael Agre's writings on artificial intelligence research: “The word ‘critical’ here does not call for pessimism and destruction but rather for an expanded understanding of the conditions and goals of technical work. . . .  Instead of seeking foundations it would embrace the impossibility of foundations, guiding itself by a continually unfolding awareness of its own workings as a historically specific practice.”  

yours, Lori

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Alberts, Gerard <G.Alberts@uva.nl> wrote:
Eh, but Tom, aren't getting off on a tangent here?
I agree with Brian that "critical" in this context is an adjective to infrastructures, not to the study of it -even if we do not have to exclude to possibility of a critical theory of infrastructures.
Infrastructures were deemed critical by those who observed that the breakdown of such infrastructures would bring the whole of society to a standstill. I would think, the high voltage power networks were the key example. Whether the expression "critical infrastructure"  was brought into the debate by military strategists, political scientists, anthropologists or by those building the networks, I do not know. Interesting historical question. Of equal interest is when and by whom IT-infrastructures were considered so crucially important, that they were called "critical".
Gerard 
Van: Members [members-bounces@lists.sigcis.org] namens Thomas Haigh [thomas.haigh@gmail.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 23 augustus 2016 23:42
Aan: 'Lori Emerson'
CC: members@lists.sigcis.org
Onderwerp: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Call for Ideas!

I don’t think critical adds a whole lot to “infrastructure studies.” It has some usefulness in formulations like “critical management studies” (a thing in Northern Europe but no so much in the US) as management scholarship is usually uncritical in every sense of the word. So “critical” demarcates a scholarly community deliberately taking a unorthodox approaches to challenge the assumptions of the field. http://www.criticalmanagement.org/content/about-cms

 

But science studies, STS, media studies, etc. manage to embrace a variety of socially and culturally informed perspectives without their practitioners needing to add the “critical” in front of them. Adding “critical” might be seen as a challenge to those currently embracing “infrastructure studies” as a scholarly identity. There’s also the question of whether “critical” means critical as in “critical thinking” or as in “critical theory,” and while critical theory certainly has a place among other approaches in the study of infrastructure not everyone would feel comfortable with the suggestion that it should be elevated over approaches grounded in STS, history, sociology, anthropology, etc.

 

Best wishes,

 

Tom

 

 

 

From: Members [mailto:members-bounces@lists.sigcis.org] On Behalf Of Lori Emerson
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:39 PM
To: Paul N. Edwards <pne@umich.edu>
Cc: Dag Spicer <dspicer@computerhistory.org>; members@lists.sigcis.org
Subject: Re: [SIGCIS-Members] Call for Ideas!

 

Dear all, I just wanted to thank you for sending in these great resources for infrastructure studies - I came across the term "critical infrastructure studies" a couple months ago and got quite excited about how it seemed more expansive and more useful for describing my projects on labs and the pre-history of the internet than either "media archaeology" or just "media studies." But now I wonder what the extra "critical" denotes since there's a somewhat well established field already of I.S.? Any thoughts?

 

yours, Lori

 

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Paul N. Edwards <pne@umich.edu> wrote:

Dag, here’s a partial list. I’ll be curious to hear what others might add.

 

Bowker & Star, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences

 

Simon & Marvin, Splintering Urbanism — kind of a giant lit review, mostly focused on urban physical infrastructure but with some attention to digital

 

 

Edwards et al., Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design (NSF report with some lit review)

 

Starosielski, The Undersea Network

 

Check the books in my Infrastructures book series, co-edited with Geof Bowker - e.g. Larry Busch, Standards: Recipes for Reality

 

Also this very recent paper on platforms vs. infrastructures - not sure it counts as “canonical”!

 

Best,

 

Paul

 

 

 

 

On Aug 22, 2016, at 16:20 , Dag Spicer <dspicer@computerhistory.org> wrote:

 

Can anyone suggest some canonical and effective texts in Infrastructure Studies?

Thanks!

Dag
--
Dag Spicer
Senior Curator
Computer History Museum
Editorial Board, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
1401 North Shoreline Boulevard
Mountain View, CA 94043-1311

Tel: +1 650 810 1035
Fax: +1 650 810 1055

_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org

 


—————————————————

Paul N. Edwards, Professor of Information and History

Distinguished Faculty in Sustainability, Graham Sustainability Institute

Senior Fellow, Michigan Society of Fellows

 

Terse replies are deliberate. Here's why! 

 

University of Michigan School of Information

4437 North Quad

105 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1285

Twitter: @AVastMachine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org



 

--

Lori Emerson
Associate Professor | Director, Media Archaeology Lab
Department of English and Intermedia Arts, Writing, and Performance 

University of Colorado at Boulder
Hellems 101, 226 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0226
loriemerson.net | mediaarchaeologylab.com




--
Lori Emerson
Associate Professor | Director, Media Archaeology Lab
Department of English and Intermedia Arts, Writing, and Performance 
University of Colorado at Boulder
Hellems 101, 226 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0226
loriemerson.net | mediaarchaeologylab.com