I'd be most grateful for pointers to very early flowcharting under any name -- esp. prior to Herman Goldstine and John von Neumann, who called flowcharts "flow diagrams", in "Planning and Coding of Problems for an Electronic Computing Instrument", Part II, Vol. I (1947). This document is available for download from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Martin Campbell-Kelly, in "From Theory to Practice: The Invention of Programming, 1947-51", p. 27, says that the term is "completely original" with Goldstine and von Neumann.
Another teasing question is what flowcharting, under any name, has to do with the phrase "think out of the box". Any clues?
Yours,
WM
On 18/04/2015 22:58, Bjorn Westergard wrote:There was some chatter about this during the Dearborn conference.I'm struggling to recall where, but I've seen some "flowcharts" forsemi-automatic computation with single-operation IBM machines.Flowcharts have a longer history in industrial engineering, which is atantalizing connection to labor history labor process theory.Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 18, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Paul Fishwick <metaphorz@gmail.com<mailto:metaphorz@gmail.com>> wrote:I recently listened to a podcast on Pickering's human-intensive computingfor processing astronomical data. Here is a wiki page that contains anoverview andphotograph from 1890:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_ComputersI am seeking diagrammatic workflow models of the types of computationthat occurredunder Pickering's direction, but more generally, any articles or textsthat contain suchdiagrams for human computing. I am familiar with modern formalismssuch asBPMN: http://www.bpmn.org/ in which business workflows might beformalized. I also haveread Grier's excellent book:http://www.amazon.com/When-Computers-Human-David-Grier/dp/0691091579/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429392009&sr=8-1&keywords=when+computers+were+human<http://www.amazon.com/When-Computers-Human-David-Grier/dp/0691091579/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429392009&sr=8-1&keywords=when+computers+were+human>The history and cultural context is interesting to me, and mostappropriate for engagingreaders, however, the main end-point in this story-telling process,for me, is for people toappreciate the path toward the diagrammatic formalisms with theirnodes, merges, branches, andconnections.If I need to, I can embark on a path toward creating some models withthe written historicalaccounts as a guide, but I thought that checking here would be thebest starting location in thisquest for diagrammatic evidence.-paulPaul Fishwick, PhDChair, ACM SIGSIMDistinguished University Chair of Arts & Technologyand Professor of Computer ScienceDirector, Creative Automata LaboratoryThe University of Texas at DallasArts & Technology800 West Campbell Road, AT10Richardson, TX 75080-3021Home: utdallas.edu/atec/fishwick <http://utdallas.edu/atec/fishwick>Lab Blog: creative-automata.com <http://creative-automata.com>SIGSIM Blog: modelingforeveryone.com <http://modelingforeveryone.com>_______________________________________________This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org <http://sigcis.org>,the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here arethose of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsedby SIGCIS. The list archives are athttp://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you canchange your subscription options athttp://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org_______________________________________________This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org
--
Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor, Department of Digital
Humanities, King's College London, and Digital Humanities Research
Group, University of Western Sydney
_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org