We toughed upon it a little bit in this article: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5455818&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5455818On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, adam spring <adamspring@gmail.com> wrote:Do you think one of the problems is, to some extent, that the viewpoint presented by Vint is from the late 90s? ie Stewart Brand.Not had time to look at other postings yet, so can't make a complete assessment. However, that was the thing that struck me when I looked at one of the BBC write ups.AdamOn Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ian S. King <isking@uw.edu> wrote:And at the University of Washington, I've worked on a Multi-Lifespan Information Systems project, the Voices from the Rwanda Tribunal. This is a real-world application of design principles to support both the bit-integrity and authenticity of digital documents, in this case the audiovisual record of interviews with members of the International Criminal Tribunal - Rwanda formed in the aftermath of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Last year, I conducted maintenance on the archive and we learned a great deal about the challenges involved - publication pending. :-)--On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Len Shustek <len@shustek.com> wrote:At 03:07 AM 2/13/2015, Brian Randell wrote:
> Digital material including key historical documents could be lost forever because programs to view them will become defunct, says Vint Cerf
We've been beating that drum for a while at the Computer History Museum, starting with a short film for the general public called "Digital Dark Age" that we did in 2011 for our permanent "Revolution" exhibition.
http://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/memory-storage/8/325/2208
The inspiration for that film was my discovery that modern versions of Powerpoint won't open presentations created by Powerpoint 1.0, which was released in 1990. In only twenty years, perfectly preserved bits were rendered useless.
-- Len
_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS
Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School
University of Washington
An optimist sees a glass half full. A pessimist sees it half empty. An engineer sees it twice as large as it needs to be.
_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members@sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://sigcis.org/pipermail/members/ and you can change your subscription options at http://sigcis.org/mailman/listinfo/members--Adam P. Spring
Skype: adampspring--Adam P. Spring
Skype: adampspring