Tom,I believe you meant “Macintosh II” each time you said “Apple II” (three occurrences). (The Apple II, sometimes referred to as the Apple ][, was of course the original late 70s Apple product.)My view is that while Apple as a company almost failed, the Macintosh was an early critical success, helped companies like Adobe create a large market for computer graphics, was widely used in education, and, after the return of Jobs, has become the most profitable personal computer brand ever, to say nothing of providing the technological base for the iPhone. Horace Dediu, the analyst who runs http://www.asymco.com, has plenty of financial information backing this.Paul McJonesSent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:17 PM
To: members@sigcis.org
Subject: [SIGCIS-Members] Counterfactual history: Did the Mac cost Apple a shot at market leadership?
Hello SIGCIS,
I’m looking for your opinions. I’m currently working on a project that involves coming up with a coherent overall narrative of the development of the modern PC. One question I’m facing is how to treat the Mac, in particular whether its development was a huge blunder by Apple. This gets into some classic questions about the role of the individual in driving history.
…Thoughts? Pointers to sources?
_______________________________________________
This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis. org