<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Dear All— </div><div><br></div><div><div>I hope some of you are able join an academic paper workshop on “Shady Subjects: Everyday Contestation in Automated Systems.” Submission deadline: October 15, 2024. Details below or at <a href="https://shadysubjects.org/" target="_blank">https://shadysubjects.org</a>.</div><br>Best,<br>Marc<br><br> -----<br><br>CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS<br><br><b>Shady Subjects: Everyday Contestation in Automated Systems<br></b><br>Workshop | April 24–26, 2025 | Ithaca, NY | Cornell University<br><br>When things go wrong with automated systems, we tend to call on lawyers, engineers, and regulators for solutions. Fairness audits, disclosure requirements, algorithmic accountability, and civil litigation are just some of the initiatives intended to redress automated harms. Yet, as anthropologists, historians, and sociologists have shown, authoritative systems tend to be gamed (Biagioli and Lippman 2020), appropriated (Eglash et al. 2004), disobeyed (Thoreau 1849), resisted (Scott 1985; Gopal 2019), ridiculed (Waller 2017), and otherwise contested long before official interventions take effect.<br><br>This academic workshop brings together scholars studying everyday practices of contestation in the shadow of an automated system. Often dismissed, denounced, or overlooked, these practices may seem trivial at first, but play a crucial—and often paradoxical—role in both challenging and sustaining automated systems. How are those affected by these systems adjusting and responding to their situations? What new and non-obvious forms of evasion, obfuscation, gaming, storytelling, false compliance, disobedience, cheating, humor, sabotage, complaining, trolling, misdirection, circumvention, workarounds, and other forms of contestation can we find? What can we learn by looking at these practices across places, times, technologies—and how might these insights help us rethink conventional notions of due process, recourse, and redress in automated systems?<br><br><b>What we’re looking for</b><br><br>The goal of the workshop is to take stock of these seemingly shady practices to analyze and theorize what happens if we consider them as an integral part of automation. We welcome empirically grounded, methodologically innovative, and analytically generative contributions from scholars in science & technology studies, history, sociology, anthropology, media studies, socio-legal studies, and related fields. We are particularly interested in historical, ethnographic, and other interpretive studies that document, contextualize, and theorize reactive practices in specific areas, periods, and settings.<br><br>The workshop is an excellent opportunity to share work in progress and think through the broader implications of studying automated systems from the margins. Book chapters, journal articles, dissertation excerpts, or a piece specifically written for the workshop are all welcome. We do not yet have a plan for a particular product. Our main goal is to invite your best, most interesting, and relevant work without prior commitment and see what—if anything—emerges during discussion.<br><br><b>What you are expected to do</b><br><br>Accepted participants are expected to submit a working paper of not more than 8,000 words for discussion in time before the workshop and act as discussant for one other paper. At the workshop, the discussant, rather than the author, introduces and leads a discussion on the paper. There are no panels or talking heads; all attendees read all papers in advance and offer constructive feedback as full participants.<br><br>The workshop takes place in person in Ithaca, NY. We will start in the afternoon of Thursday, April 24, 2025 and wrap up after lunch on Saturday, April 26, 2025.<br><br><b>How to apply</b><br><br>If you’re interested in attending, please submit the following information by October 1, 2024 at <a href="https://shadysubjects.org/" target="_blank">https://shadysubjects.org/</a>:<br><br>* Name, email, affiliation<br>* 600–750-word abstract, detailing your study, contribution, and relation to the workshop theme<br>* Short biography (<200 words) and link to profile/work (if available)<br>* Three articles or books related to the workshop theme you recommend<br><br>Accepted paper authors will receive a travel stipend and accommodation. Participation is limited; we expect to invite ten paper authors, which leaves space for a small number of<br><br><b>Key dates</b><br><br>Abstract deadline: October 15, 2024<br>Selection notification: Early November, 2024<br>Papers for circulation: March 25, 2025<br>Workshop: April 24–26, 2025<br><br>Questions? Email the organizers at <a href="mailto:shadysubjects@cornell.edu" target="_blank">shadysubjects@cornell.edu</a>.<br><br><b>Organizers</b><br><br>Malte Ziewitz (Cornell) & Marc Aidinoff (IAS, Cornell). Additional Program Committee Members: Gili Vidan & Karen Levy.<br><br>The workshop is supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Science & Technology Studies, and the Digital Due Process Clinic at Cornell University.<br clear="all"></div></body></html>