<div dir="ltr">A lot of the material circulated on early networks was pre-publication scholarly literature. That would certainly take up a lot of network traffic, just by its nature.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:01 PM Win Treese <<a href="mailto:treese@acm.org">treese@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">HI, Tom. Stephen Lukasik’s retrospective "Why the Arpanet Was Built” (IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, <br>
July-September 2011, pp. 4-21, vol. 33 <a href="https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/an/2011/03/man2011030004/13rRUxly9fL" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/an/2011/03/man2011030004/13rRUxly9fL</a>) says "A 1974 Mitre study of Arpanet usage showed that about three-quarters of the traffic was email”. <br>
<br>
It seems odd that Licklider and Vezza said a lot about email but didn’t include that fact in their 1978 “Applications of Information Networks” paper (Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 66, NO. 11, November 1978). They wrote (among other statements:<br>
<br>
"By the fall of 1973, the great effectiveness and convenience of <br>
such fast, informed messages services... had been discovered by <br>
almost everyone who had worked on the development of the ARPANET -- <br>
and especially by the then Director of ARPA, S.J. Lukasik, who soon <br>
had most of his office directors and program managers communicating <br>
with him and with their colleagues and their contractors via the <br>
network. Thereafter, both the number of (intercommunicating) <br>
electronic mail systems and the number of users of them on the <br>
ARPANET increased rapidly."<br>
<br>
A Gizmodo article from 2016 (<a href="https://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/the-defense-department-got-mad-at-darpa-for-creating-em-1763274070" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/the-defense-department-got-mad-at-darpa-for-creating-em-1763274070</a>) has:<br>
<br>
BEGIN QUOTE<br>
The explosion of email was swift. In 1974, ARPA asked MITRE to study how the network was being used. They were shocked to find out that roughly 75 percent of the net packets were for email.<br>
<br>
I reached out to Steve Lukasik, former director of ARPA during the late 1960s and early 1970s, who told me about the bureaucratic hurdles that the agency faced once they had cracked email’s technical problems. History books often ignore, or don’t fully appreciate, the bureaucratic hurdles that must be jumped to accomplish major technological feats. Al Gore didn’t invent the internet, for example, but without him the bureaucratic barriers wouldn’t have been overcome to privatize it.<br>
<br>
Email’s use of 75 percent of network traffic in 1974 “had enormous bureaucratic implications that were initially worrisome,” Lukasik told me. “DoD auditors slapped our wrist for violating DoD procedures. They said we had constructed a communication system, but that was the responsibility of the Defense Communication Agency.”<br>
END QUOTE<br>
<br>
I couldn’t find any actual details on the "MITRE study” beyond that. It’s fragmentary, but perhaps helpful.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Win<br>
<br>
Win Treese<br>
<a href="mailto:treese@acm.org" target="_blank">treese@acm.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 1:36 AM, <a href="mailto:thomas.haigh@gmail.com" target="_blank">thomas.haigh@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hello SIGCIS,<br>
> <br>
> Our of the last unsourced footnotes for the Revised History of Modern Computing holds a note to myself concerning a possibly exaggerated factoid from the “Hobbes’ Internet Timeline.” <a href="https://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/</a><br>
> <br>
> According to the timeline entry for 1973: “ARPA study shows email composing 75% of all ARPANET traffic.” Keep in mind that Tomlinson sent the first network mail in 1971 and mail technologies were rather immature for the first few years.<br>
> <br>
> If that is true it’s certainly a fact worth including in the book to demonstrate the very rapid spread of email on the ARPANET. But “ARPANET study” is not something I can use to confirm the original source.<br>
> <br>
> I haven’t been able to find anything so specific in Janet Abbate’s book Inventing the Internet though she features email prominently and agree that its rise was both rapid and unexpected. Ian Hardy’s undergraduate thesis, an early historical look at Internet email, does not include this particular figure. <a href="https://www.livinginternet.com/References/Ian%20Hardy%20Email%20Thesis.txt" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.livinginternet.com/References/Ian%20Hardy%20Email%20Thesis.txt</a> Craig Partridge’s IEEE Annals article “Technical Development of Internet Email” didn’t, on a recent skim, seem to say anything on this topic either.<br>
> <br>
> Does anyone know where this number might be coming from? Or have a well-sourced alternative for slightly later year like 1975 or 76?<br>
> <br>
> Best wishes,<br>
> <br>
> Tom<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> This email is relayed from members at <a href="http://sigcis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">sigcis.org</a>, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/</a> and you can change your subscription options at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
This email is relayed from members at <a href="http://sigcis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">sigcis.org</a>, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/</a> and you can change your subscription options at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org</a></blockquote></div>