<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hello SIGCIS,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m canvassing opinion on a small topic, as I work with Paul Ceruzzi to finalize revisions on the revised History of Modern Computing. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There are a lot of style choices like FORTRAN vs Fortran, Internet vs internet, etc. where dominant usage has evolved over the past twenty years, generally in the clear direction of not capitalizing things that aren’t acronyms. We’re planning to follow that, while still capitalizing Internet and Web to respect the historical context.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>On the other hand, since the first edition the pioneering PDP-1 video game formerly known as Spacewar has grown an exclamation point to become Spacewar!. This causes problems with punctuation, as in the previous sentence. It did not have one in either of the accounts that made it famous, Levy’s <i>Hackers</i> (1984) and Brand’s 1972 article “SPACEWAR: Fanatic Life and Symbolic Death Among the Computer Bums.” So one might assume that any punctuation attached to it in its original MIT incarnation had fallen by the wayside as it spread. The original Modern History followed this then-standard usage.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Wikipedia now has the exclamation point, and so does the Computer History Museum: <a href="https://www.computerhistory.org/pdp-1/spacewar/">https://www.computerhistory.org/pdp-1/spacewar/</a>. The Smithsonian appears to have endorsed it in its writeup of the NMAH anniversary event, <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/how-first-popular-video-game-kicked-off-generations-virtual-adventure-180971020/">https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/how-first-popular-video-game-kicked-off-generations-virtual-adventure-180971020/</a>. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So I assume that this general shift must reflect some kind of movement in video game studies to reattach a lost piece of punctuation.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>On the other hand, there’s a precedent for not using an exclamation point in books or articles even when it is part of a company self presentation: Yahoo!! (The second exclamation point there is my own excitement). The company used it consistently, but the AP Style Guide tells journalists to drop it when writing about Yahoo. We’re following that in the revised history.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So I’m torn about whether to follow the trend and use “Spacewar!” throughout, despite the punctuation problems it causes, or to apply the same logic as Yahoo and use “Spacewar” with an initial parenthetical observation that the official name is “Spacewar!”.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best wishes,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><br>Tom<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>