<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi Eric, <div><br></div><div>I think this is a wonderful teachable moment on more than one level. At least when my daughter was a 6th grader, I could have seen her digging into this topic with gusto. </div><div><br></div><div>Instead of thinking of these qualifiers as "hedges", I think this is a great opportunity to educate him and his classmates on all of the ways humans have done computing. There are two basic categories, analog and digital - continuous vs. discrete domain and range. For each category, there are differing media: mechanical, electrical, electronic, even water! (I'm trying to envision a liquid-based digital computer - maybe biocomputing?) Since he is researching "the first", this avoids the tar pit of the first "personal" computer - now that would confound a 6th grader, as well as most adults! </div><div><br></div><div>Sources are tough, though - there won't be one across all (but that's a fun lesson in library method). I'd certainly agree that Paul Ceruzzi's book is very good for the early digital electronic computer, and the transition to stored-program, than being something else I'd consider a key concept for a non-expert. One could go all the way back to the Antikythera device for mechanical analog computing, but it might be better to focus on things like Bush's Differential Analyzer for that. ENIAC is obviously in there for electronic digital, but how does one come down on the ABC? And outside the US, Zuse's machines were early to the gate. </div><div><br></div><div>So many fun dimensions! One would need to bound this rich set appropriately, but perhaps thinking of this as an opportunity to teach deeper concepts about what it means to compute through an examination of how we've been doing it for decades if not centuries. </div><div><br></div><div>Just one opinion -- Ian King</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:13 PM Hintz, Eric <<a href="mailto:HintzE@si.edu">HintzE@si.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_1343753310548345343WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi SIGCIS-<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My buddy emailed and said (paraphrasing): “My son’s a 6<sup>th</sup> grader; he and his classmates are doing research projects. They have to interview an expert on some topic. His classmate wants to research ‘the first computer.’ Can
my son’s classmate interview you?” Being an all-purpose “expert,” I said yes!
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As historians, we tend to reject absolutes, hedge, and use qualifying adjectives like the first “electronic” or “programmable” or “personal” computer. But this is a 6<sup>th</sup> grader, so I don’t want to confuse him with too many carefully
constructed hedges. So I appeal to the wisdom of this crowd… <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Q: How would you approach this 6<sup>th</sup> grader’s legitimate interest in the first computer? Which computer(s) should I/we focus on? Best books or other resources (e.g. Ceruzzi’s
<i>Concise History</i>) to help me and the sixth grader get the facts straight? <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Many thanks!<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric Hintz<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">======================<br></span></p></div></div></blockquote></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate<br><a href="http://ischool.uw.edu" target="_blank">The Information School</a><br></div><div>Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical Narrative Through a Design Lens<br></div><div><br></div><div>Principal Investigator, "<span style="font-size:12.8px">Reflections on Early Computing and Social Change", UW IRB #42619</span></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Archivist, <a href="http://tribunalvoices.org" target="_blank">Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal</a> </div><div dir="ltr"><a href="http://vsdesign.org" target="_blank">Value Sensitive Design Research Lab</a></div><div dir="ltr"><br>University of Washington<br><br><font color="#424242"><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:19px"><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."</font><font face="courier new, monospace"> </font></span></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>