<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">My guess is that the term, Motherboard, was derived from the term Mothership, which is still in common usage by the general population, and according to several online dictionaries originated in the 19th century. Note that when techs and engineers refer to Motherboards, they normally use the gender neutral pronoun, "it".<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">cheers,</div><div class="">Mike Willegal</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 23, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Mark Priestley <<a href="mailto:m.priestley@gmail.com" class="">m.priestley@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">Hi Caitlin,<br class=""><br class=""></div>I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing you're looking for, but some CS pioneers were rather keen to use the master-slave metaphor to talk about human-computer relations. Eg:<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div>Jack Good reported that: "Turing used to refer jocularly to people who are forced to do<br class="">mechanical operations as slaves."<br class=""><br class=""></div>Bardini quotes Engelbart: "Think ahead to the day when computer technology might provide for your very own use the full-time services of a completely attentive, very patient, very fast symbol-manipulating slave who has an IQ adequate for 95% of your today's mental tasks."<br class=""><br class=""></div>And there's <a href="http://markpriestley.net/pdfs/Huskey.pdf" class="">this</a> unfortunate Newsweek caption about Harry Huskey.<br class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think probably links back to earlier tropes about robots: eg in Capek's RUR, the rebellious robots are precisely slaves. I've got an unpublished conference paper I wrote a few years back about this which I could dig out if you're interested.<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div>Cheers,<br class=""></div>Mark<br class=""><br class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 May 2017 at 18:29, McMillan, William W <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:william.mcmillan@cuaa.edu" target="_blank" class="">william.mcmillan@cuaa.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Caitlin, this is an interesting study!<br class="">
<br class="">
I'm not sure, though, if "today's engineers" would very readily coin gender-specific terms for parts of computers. These terms go back a long way.<br class="">
<br class="">
The "master-slave" terminology has going for it that the relationship between, say, a bus arbiter and connected devices is, in truth, a master-slave relationship. The other connotations make it hard for me to use the terms in class, but it's difficult to find synonyms. Controller-controlled? Decider-doer? Kind of awkward. (Suggestions welcome!)<br class="">
<br class="">
In contrast to the gendered terms, in describing the tree data structure, the relationship between nodes has always been parent-child, back at least to Knuth's volumes, not father-son, mother-son, or the like. Same with object/class hierarchies.<br class="">
<br class="">
- Bill<br class="">
<br class="">
______________________________<wbr class="">__<br class="">
From: Members [<a href="mailto:members-bounces@lists.sigcis.org" class="">members-bounces@lists.sigcis.<wbr class="">org</a>] on behalf of Wylie, Caitlin Donahue (cdw9y) [<a href="mailto:cdw9y@eservices.virginia.edu" class="">cdw9y@eservices.virginia.edu</a>]<br class="">
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 8:11 PM<br class="">
To: <a href="mailto:members@SIGCIS.org" class="">members@SIGCIS.org</a><br class="">
Subject: [SIGCIS-Members] History of gendered terms, e.g., "motherboard"<br class="">
<br class="">
Dear all,<br class="">
Do you know of any studies of gendered language in computing? I’m intrigued by the way today’s engineers throw around words like “motherboard” and “daughterboard”, and also “master” and “slave”, without being aware of how those words sound to non-engineers (like me). I’d be interested in learning about historical or sociological studies.<br class="">
<br class="">
Thank you!<br class="">
<br class="">
All the best,<br class="">
Caitlin Wylie<br class="">
_______________________<br class="">
Caitlin D. Wylie, Ph.D.<br class="">
Assistant Professor<br class="">
Program in Science, Technology and Society<br class="">
University of Virginia<br class="">
<a href="mailto:wylie@virginia.edu" class="">wylie@virginia.edu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:wylie@virginia.edu" class="">wyli<wbr class="">e@virginia.edu</a>><br class="">
<a href="http://www.eands.virginia.edu/faculty-staff/wylie/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://www.eands.virginia.edu/<wbr class="">faculty-staff/wylie/</a><br class="">
<br class="">
______________________________<wbr class="">_________________<br class="">
This email is relayed from members at <a href="http://sigcis.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">sigcis.org</a>, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.sigcis.org/<wbr class="">pipermail/members-sigcis.org/</a> and you can change your subscription options at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.sigcis.org/<wbr class="">listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.<wbr class="">org</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">This email is relayed from members at <a href="http://sigcis.org" class="">sigcis.org</a>, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/" class="">http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/</a> and you can change your subscription options at <a href="http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org" class="">http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org</a></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>