[SIGCIS-Members] Steve Shirley obit

[Roberts, Sarah]

To divorce pressure from families and pressure from/within companies, to include larger social pressure, would likely be ahistorical, personal and/or isolated cases aside. 


———

S a r a h  T.  R o b e r t s,  P h. D.

> On Sep 15, 2025, at 14:14, Brian E Carpenter via Members <members at lists.sigcis.org> wrote:
> 
> Mar,
> 
> Thanks for that. May I just comment on one point? You write
> 
> "Shirley’s first major “help wanted” advertisement for her new company,
> published in the Times of London in 1964, noted that her company
> had “many opportunities for retired programmers (female) to work
> part-time at home.” In this era, the term “retirement” was used to
> describe the situation women, who were as young as their twenties,
> found themselves in when they were all but required to leave the workforce
> upon getting married (fig. 13.1)."
> 
> I very much doubt that the requirement to leave work upon marriage was imposed by the companies, especially by ICL which is the example in Fig. 13.1. I have two counter-examples, as it happens: Ruth Engleback (née Thomson) who was hired by BTM (which became ICT and then ICL) in 1954, then married, but only left her job in 1959 when she had her first child [1]; and my own late wife who joined EELM (which became part of ICL) in 1967 _after_ her first marriage, becoming a programming team leader; she left in 1969 for a better job.
> 
> I suspect that Mary Berners-Lee (née Woods) was an earlier counter-example. She left Ferranti when "her first child was born" according to Wikipedia. (The fact that he grew up to invent the Web is beside the point.)
> 
> The 1960s was a time of rapid social change in the UK, and the societal expectation that women should quit work upon marriage was also changing rapidly, but came at least as much from families as it did from employers.
> 
> I don't mean in the least to downplay Steve Shirley's achievement, but the context was one of social change. Increasingly, it was the first child, not marriage, that forced a career break. Of course, provision for maternity leave was non-existent in those days.
> 
> [1] https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2020.2990647
> 
> Regards/Ngā mihi
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
>> On 16-Sep-25 07:36, Hicks, Mar (avg5bd) via Members wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Agreed—Shirley was a very interesting player in the software industry. She focused on hiring many of the women being forced out of their jobs in computing in the 1960s and onward, as I talk about in/Programmed Inequality <https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262535182/programmed-inequality/>/.
>> If you’re interested in reading more about Shirley and the gender and labor dynamics at her company, a preprint of my recent chapter in Janet Abbate and Stephanie Dick’s new edited collection is below. Notably, Shirley saw the broad societal importance of work from home accommodations in high tech long before most others in the industry: https://marhicks.com/writing/Hicks-BabyAndBlackBox.pdf <https://marhicks.com/writing/Hicks-BabyAndBlackBox.pdf>
>> For a 3 min summary on bsky, see here:
>> https://bsky.app/profile/histoftech.bsky.social/post/3lx2veouoa22o <https://bsky.app/profile/histoftech.bsky.social/post/3lx2veouoa22o>
>> She definitely had a long, fascinating, and important life.
>> Best,
>> Mar
>> ________________________
>> Mar Hicks
>> Associate Professor
>> School of Data Science
>> University of Virginia
>> marhicks at virginia.edu
>> marhicks.com <https://marhicks.com/>
>> Research Affiliate,Centre for Democracy and Technology <https://www.mctd.ac.uk/>, University of Cambridge
>> Member, Scholars' Council,Center for Critical Internet Inquiry <https://www.c2i2.ucla.edu/>, UCLA
>> Associate Editor,/IEEE Annals of the History of Computing <https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/an>/ (feel free to ask me about submitting an article if you work on a topic related to computing history)
>> Books:
>> /Programmed Inequality <https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/programmed-inequality>//: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing/(MIT Press, 2017)
>> /Your Computer Is On Fire <https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/your-computer-fire>/// (MIT Press, 2021)
>> _______________________________________________
>> This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org
> _______________________________________________
> This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org