[SIGCIS-Members] The Women of Datamation

[dave.walden.family at gmail.com]

re women programmers, see the right column of the second page at
   http://walden-family.com/ieee/anhc-34-2-eands-whirlwind.pdf
and the paragraph which begins "Forrester was asked about software".

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 2, 2015, at 9:26 PM, Murray Turoff <murray.turoff at gmail.com> wrote:

> In the early days of computers, the mid 60' to mid 70' some of the best programmers were females who had been English majors in college and who later learned to program.  They were very good also at learning new languages when needed.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Dag Spicer <dspicer at computerhistory.org> wrote:
> Dear SIGCIS friends,
> 
> I’m beginning research for a long-form essay on how women were used to sell computers as protrayed in the industry magazine Datamation.
> 
> I have completed my survey of images and am now seeking some guodance abdout possible theoretical perspectives to consider.
> 
> Estelle Freedman at Stanford pointed me to The Feminine Mystique, which I am now reading.  Of course, that was written many decades ago.  I don’t really track the scholarship in this area so any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Working observation: In the late 1950s, women were portrayed as functional, "sensibly” dressed, clerical workers using the computer in a (contrived) but plausibly real-world application.  Beginning in the mid-1960s and onwards into the mid 1970s, women were portrayed as highly sexualized, alluringly dressed “human parsley,” garnishing a computer product -- in one case literally draped over a mainframe CPU cabinet in a bikini — with no relevance or appeal to the usual benfits cited for computers, viz. efficiency, cost-control, &c.  One of many questions I have: Does this long-term movement to sex rather than the prior economic or technical arguments reflect a change in the people making computer purchasing decisions?  Was it an ephemeral trope in adverstising — “it was the 60s, man!” or something else?  Sex sells… but who’s buying?  How does the portrayal of women in the leading journal for the ccomputer industry over decades reflect buerys and sellers?  Can we draw parallels with how other technologies have used women in their advertising?   &c.
> 
> Thanks for any thoughts…
> 
> Dag
> --
> Dag Spicer
> Senior Curator
> Computer History Museum
> Editorial Board, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
> 1401 North Shoreline Boulevard
> Mountain View, CA 94043-1311
> 
> Tel: +1 650 810 1035
> Fax: +1 650 810 1055
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> please send messages to murray.turoff at gmail.com  do not use @njit.edu address
> 
> Distinguished Professor Emeritus
> Information Systems, NJIT
> homepage: http://is.njit.edu/turoff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This email is relayed from members at sigcis.org, the email discussion list of SHOT SIGCIS. Opinions expressed here are those of the member posting and are not reviewed, edited, or endorsed by SIGCIS. The list archives are at http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/ and you can change your subscription options at http://lists.sigcis.org/listinfo.cgi/members-sigcis.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/attachments/20150903/09d26f56/attachment-0002.htm>