[SIGCIS-Members] COBOL history
Burtgrad at aol.com
Burtgrad at aol.com
Mon Oct 6 09:23:14 PDT 2014
As a practitioner, not a historian, I can't debate the details of the
creation of COBOL. But I joined Bob Bemer's group in IBM's Data Processing
Division in February, 1960 (Roy Goldfinger was part of that group). IBM had
designed COMTRAN as the counterpart of FORTRAN and planned to make the language
available for use by any manufacturer or user company just as it had with
FORTRAN. The IBM people felt that COMTRAN was a consistent language and was
superior to COBOL and continued to plan to implement COMTRAN compilers in
1960. But, as I recall, the pressure from DoD particularly was too strong
and therefore IBM made a marketing decision to drop COMTRAN and only support
COBOL, in spite of what IBM perceived as its deficiencies.
I was not privy to the debates within the CODASYL committee, only to what I
heard from Bob Bemer and Roy Goldfinger (and other members of Bemer's
team), about how the final decisions were made,,,but I had a strong impression
that the other manufacturers (Univac, RCA, Honeywell and others) were not
willing to have IBM be the "owner" of the commercial language as it was of
the scientific language.
There is no doubt in my mind that Grace Hopper believed that COBOL was
principally based on her work at Univac (she is quoted in many interviews to
that effect including at least one on the Computer History Museum website)
and, barring any forensic analysis that provesd otherwise, I expect that is
as close to the truth as we will get now that so many of the CODASYL
participants have died and probably have not left detailed records of the
committee deliberations.
Burt Grad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sigcis.org/pipermail/members-sigcis.org/attachments/20141006/362e5142/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Members
mailing list